They Make It Move: Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich

Trowbridge isn’t exactly known locally for being the birthplace of any famous people, or for at some point having been the home of some notable names. Sure there’s a few… Sir Isaac Pitman, who developed Pitman shorthand, was long commemorated with the name of a pub in the town centre. Taunton-born multi-millionaire Deborah Meaden graduated from John of Gaunt, as many will readily tell you. Hugh Cornwall’s time in Trowbridge inspired a crap song that exhibits the bland, cynical sense of humour people seem to have about the places they live. Maybe that’s all. Dave Dee, from Salisbury, attended what was once the Adcroft School of Building. A real pop star was educated here in the town…

And yet no one here realises except myself. Why have Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich been allowed to slide into a relative obscurity, despite their eight top ten hits and thirteen top 40 hits? 1966’s second-biggest selling band in Britain? We can start with the name; songwriters Ken Howard and Alan Blaikley (together known as Howard Blaikley) encouraged them to change it from Dave Dee and the Bostons to something more distinctive (discarded names included The Lions and The Actions, the latter presumably as it was virtually identical to The Action). While the Monkees, superstar Americans, have had plenty of attention in the ensuing years, the unspoken snub affixed to Dave Dee and co is as they so readily set themselves as fun and feathery from the name down, rather than what was becoming known as rock. And yet behind that joyful veneer is music of great, unprecedented adventure. Their innovations are mistook for just gimmicks (whereas in truth they are both). Put simply, they were far greater and more impactful than radio programming – which pushes the 60s’ unsalvaged stalwarts ever further away – would have you believe.

Emerging from Salisbury’s club scene, their Bostons-era sets comprised an array of comedy, pop and close harmony covers, all talents which would prove central to their work on the other side of the name change, and they were fortunate enough to be playing a venue in Swindon when Denis D’Ell of the Honeycombs spotted their potential and introduced them to Blaikley, who with Howard had written them a chart-topper with “Have I the Right?”, and the pair negotiated them a deal with Fontana and a move to London (although the group remained Salisbury royalty and regularly found themselves back in the city for business or pleasure). Having spent a decade expanding pop’s sonic lexicon into uncharted worlds, Honeycombs producer Joe Meek was hired to oversee their first session, but his revolutionary plans to tape the band at half-speed so he could then accelerate the recording playback and pile on the idiosyncratic effects which likely only made sense on paper to him was thwarted by, inevitably, the difficulty the band faced in playing so slowly. But what couldn’t have been foreseen by anyone at this early point is that eventually their records would reach otherworldly standards worthy of Meek’s singular vision.

From the outset, Howard Blaikley were to write every single for the band with the belief that they should all seem effortless, even as songs later became highly intricate. Anything that felt too laboured had to be binned. Moreover, past the early singles, the plan was to make every single “a little bit different”, as guitarist Tich Amey put it. Dee would explain in 1968: “We go to the sea for one, Mexico for another, to Russia for another. But we also aim for simplicity, especially on stage, for the reason that we want to get through to the fans, not leave them wondering what it’s all about”. Their flamboyant music was matched visually by their dress senses – and that’s whether being themselves or promoting a specific release (although in their downtime they fancied themselves for a while as mods) – ditto their very physical performances which played up the special novelties of each single.

Baby steps. Bobbie Graham replaced Meek for their debut single, January 1965’s “No Time”. A repetitious, stripped back number with an almost symmetrical attraction, already Howard Blaikley’s global flavours were apparent, due to the song’s waltz time, whistling and – as authors Frogg Moody and Richard Nash put it – “a hint of the Munich beer halls” (the band had toured Germany in 1964 and it remained their largest market to the end), but such impulses would subside for a while thereafter. Unexpectedly for a gang of part-time mods, this first outing seemed to plant its flag far from rock and roll. Wishing to earn a bit of cash from songwriting themselves, the band would frequently write B-sides and album tracks, and so it proved from the outset with “Is It Love?”, a swooning, jangling ballad evoking Beatles for Sale. The single flopped (except in Singapore, where it reached the top three), as did the ensuing “All I Want” which exhibits a comparatively straightforward beat style.

UK success would wait until the Top 30 hit “You Make It Move” at the end of December, a instantly alluring proto-glam stomp stapled by a mechanical beat only pronouncing its inherent innuendo. This was their only single with producer Howie Condell but he presents an important step in the band’s development – a momentary solo for Tich Amey’s scratchy fuzz guitar and a piano that sounds as though abandoned in the roomiest of gymnasiums marking a particular step towards the band’s more expansive, studio-based future.

But emotionally drained by restless touring unreconciled by any real commercial success domestically, the group considered splitting. It was a final throw of the dice, “Hold Tight”, that single-handedly reinstated their enthusiasm when it made inroads through the hit parade, peaking at No. 4 in April 1966 and establishing an almost unbroken chain of eight consecutive top 10 hits. A furious yet lovable thrash, it destabilises the ear instantly with its hypnotic drums, pounding bass drones and a menacing, single-note guitar slitting its way into the sonic picture (a noise-terror brutalism achieved by Amey utilising a Coloursound Fuzz Unit, making him only the second guitarist after Jeff Beck to own one). New and long-time producer Steve Rowland made sure every sound on the song was mixed for maximum impact, while Dee – using a breathless football terrace chant for its melody (its a chicken and egg scenario as to which came first, but he was inspired by a rhythm which their German fans would bang on tables at Hamburg’s Top Ten Club) – becomes more frantic with each round, the song a staircase for every bar to ascend, until he and the band fall back into a chorus of harmonic – not to say libidinous – ecstasy.

A follow-up, “Hideaway”, spent three consecutive weeks at No. 10 in July and was another distorted, relatively uncomplicated rocker to prelude the band’s debut album. Released that summer and charting at No. 11, Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich was designed to cohere particularly well as a pop album as was becoming the norm. Although mostly composed by Howard Blaikley alongside other professional writers, “All I Want to Do” stood out as an excellent band composition with busy percussion and stop-start windows on its funky bassline, and while much of the record straddles the line between beat and freakbeat, no one would have expected “DDD-BMT”, the intro track in which Kenny Everett can’t remember the band members names, or the Meek-ish space whistle breaks on “Frustration”, as though Dee’s romantic anxieties had become so gruelling they physically shoot upwards from his head (underscored by his reduction into quivering insanity in its final moments). The sexual politics of “Nose for Trouble”, sung by Beaky, have not aged well but who could resist its old-time violin fundament and general sense of mischief (could this be their ‘Ringo’ song)? And then Tich leads the band through the Rowland-written 007-themed R&B of “Double Agent” to finish. Some strange yet logical sequencing arrives when “Hold Tight” is paired with its mirror image, “Hard to Love You”, since both use the same leapfrogging, chanting structure, two different ways of getting to the same climax.

But if “Hold Tight!” had been barely subtle in its bedroom evocations, the suggestiveness of the group’s next single, “Bend It!”, was enough to corner some mainstream awareness and criticism, although not even this stopped it reaching No. 2 in October (if anything it likely helped). What could the title, and the ever accelerating-and-decelerating flow of the song possibly be a metaphor for? But here is where things went from great to magnificent. It wasn’t enough to simply structure a pop song around carnal cadence – getting faster and faster until, suddenly, it pauses (and the quaintness of Dee’s flagrant, wriggling little finger in adverts for the single stops it seeming too gross) – as this was where the group, Howard Blaikley and Rowland properly began treating each single as an offbeat experiment in itself, each hit from hereon in inspired by a different musical mode from somewhere in the world. “Bend It!” structurally parallels the Greek “Zorba’s Dance” (a No. 6 hit a year earlier for Marcello Minerbi & His Orchestra) and doubles up this impression by Tich achieving the sound of a bouzouki or balalaika by exploiting the possibilities of his electric mandola (key to imitating the instrument in concert).

Their penchant for the ‘exotic’ stringed instrument was, perhaps inadvertently, reflective of the times as pop and rock groups looked to for similar augmentation (and then, much like Dave Dee and friends, pose with their new discoveries in press shoots). Pinkerton’s Assorted Colours icily brought the autoharp to the top ten in February with “Mirror, Mirror” (the secret progenitor of the Manics’ “So Why So Sad”?), while 1965 saw an epochal sequence of hits that recreated sitar drones on guitar – the Beatles’ “Ticket to Ride”, the Yardbirds’ “Heart Full of Soul” and the Kinks’ “See My Friends”. Only three weeks after “Bend It!” left the No. 2 spot, the spot was occupied by its close sibling “Stop Stop Stop” by the Holies, who ran banjo through delayed tape echo to achieve their own balalaika drone. It seemed like mining new areas in pop, however tentatively, was by now fully on the cards.

For the follow-up “Save Me” (No. 3 in December), the mood of the day was Latin music as foregrounded by the metallic syncopation and drum fills provided by Beaky and session player Dennis Lopez. Yet put the record on and once that heavy four-floor beat thwacks in time with the samba you’d be forgiven for thinking you were hearing Latin disco – indeed, you can momentarily imagine this being 1982 Modern Romance, as my friend Huw Thomas has it. This isn’t something you could say about Unit 4+2’s baião-flavoured number one “Concrete and Clay” (1965), the only real precedent for “Save Me” in terms of beat bands in search of that Brazilian top-up. At the other end of the song, an ominous drone starts to encroach the music as Dee begins hysterically screaming as Barry Ryan will in a few years hence before everything is hurriedly and distressfully shut off, just to make the song even more compelling and inscrutable.

Both “Bend It” and “Save Me” appeared on the rush-released second Dave Dee et al album, December 1966’s If Music Be the Food of Love… Prepare for Indigestion, which bottomed out at No. 37 during the first week of January. The quick turnover potentially reveals why its quality threshold is not as high as the debut, but it still is diverting enough to contain two band compositions: the gothic, Yardbirdsian “Shame!” (already the “Save Me” B-side) – closing with a vicious slash of saturated guitar that emanates in and out of its decay – and “Master Llewellyn” which by querying whether their schooldays were all that fantastic makes it a dry-run for “Baggy Trousers”. Away from the two hits, the Howard Blaikley highlights are “Hands Off!”, an R&B number taken with a rumbling bass drone and metronomic beat which combine for at times an almost motorik totality, and best of all the march band novelty “The Loos of England”, a celebration of the crapness of English crappers relative to those in other countries, sung in a cod-highbrow manner to a concert hall arrangement centred on bass, mandolin and violin. Originally intended for Patrick Kerr but turned down by CBS for obvious reasons, it instead led the only DDDBM&T EP and provides a useful stylistic bridge between Flanders & Swann and the Bonzos.

It didn’t matter too much at this point that the albums were selling poorly, because the hit singles kept coming. “Touch Me, Touch Me” is pumped up freakbeat that forewent overt timbral for structural playfulness – that is, it speeds breathlessly through 12/8 verses. Released in March 1967, the song only peaked at No. 13 but the group resumed their run in the upper echelons of the charts with “Okay!” (No. 4 in June), which returned to the Greek/Eastern European modes of “Bend It!” through Tich’s quivering balalaika and Beaky’s accordion. Dee’s frustration that his continental romantic fling cannot last is underscored in the music, particularly in how certain beats are stressed by the band stomping together on a wooden floor (an idea Howard Blaikley borrowed from Meek’s production of “Have I the Right?”) As if to invert the anxiety, the B-side is a very evocative, group-composed mod banger named “He’s a Raver”.

Even these adventures feel relatively innocuous next to “Zabadak!” The title, although feeling somewhat exotic, is actually as meaningless as many of the lyrics, but almost subliminally spilling from them is a solitary yet vital line, “Look for meaning not in words but the way you’re feeling”. At the end of 1967, a year in which the ‘meaning’, use and interpretation of pop songs had far accelerated, this comes over like a declaration of pop’s principles, its essence – the importance of nonsensical words in pop, the barely-between-the-lines joy they represent, the way they make you feel. But also, note that line about drawing meaning in “the way you’re feeling”. In the middle of an apparently senseless pop song, the feeling can only be emphasised – nay, originated – with the music.

And put bluntly, nothing in else in pop sounded like “Zabadak!” Nothing in pop 54 years later does, either. Until now, every single – no matter how daring – was crafted carefully enough so as to be recreated on stage, but that rule of thumb was merrily, irretrievably binned, for there are fewer pop productions of the 1960s as flat out strange, as inclusive or layered as this, Rowland and the band fully exploiting, as was quickly becoming the want for the time, the worlds of the studio. Vaguely inspired by something from Arabic radio, the ‘African’ tribal beat – which appears out of an already thick soundscape of birdsong – is in fact four drummers (including Mick Wilson) double-tracked to become eight, using a log drum, two Zamba drums, kettledrums and jawbones (some likely played by other hands). Underneath the rhythm somewhere are a cued up piano, string bass and three acoustic guitars, while a 20-piece orchestra (most of which are violinists but there are multiple cellos and violas to be detected too) eventually makes itself known. 25 vocalists – from the band to Rowland and members of neighbouring groups like Howard Blaikley’s new clients The Herd – sing in wonky harmony. No electric instruments appear anywhere.

And it is an absolute riot with no peer, like a Jon Hassel fourth-world study getting gatecrashed by the most drunken (or, more accurately, highest) gang of mates, a group that grows in number until suddenly what started off as an earthy soundscape has become the most inclusive psychedelic happening this side of “A Day in the Life”. The hand percussion sticks out and falls from the mix like narcotic free-improv while the unutterably heavy low end – coupled with the extremely cavernous sound (this takes pop to new worlds of echo) – threatens to crack the ground completely, dragging this most delirious party with it (and gives this listener premonitions of dub). A No. 3 hit in November, this was a new beginning for pop, because although nothing truly sounds like it, you can feel its kinship everywhere through decades of experimental pop (Brian Eno, Fun Boy Three, The Creatures, The Orb, Super Furry Animals, Animal Collective). It may just be the greatest record the band ever released. Plus, the similarly absurd B-side “The Sun Goes Down” – written by Dee, Dozy and Beaky – is a gothic psych-rock masterpiece with drowsy guitars, tolling bells, backwards equipage and a truly submerged Dave Dee delivering swooning melismas from another ether. Had it been a one-off single by some obscure chancers, it would fetch today for £1,000 and line no shortage of record collector psych compilations.

Consolidating on their winning streak in March 1968, Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich finally achieved a UK No. 1 with “The Legend of Xanadu”. They had now turned their attention to spaghetti westerns and mariachi, and this was their most explicit story song to date, reflecting the popcorn TV they may have watched as youngsters (but although Howard Blaikley had began stirring songs away from romantic and sexual encounters – not only for Dave Dee et al but their other groups, most notably The Herd, whose “From the Underworld” is among 1967’s greatest singles – “Xanadau” still plays out a gun-slinging duel of love, foreshadowing or maybe even influencing “Rocky Raccoon”). The trumpets are ablaze enough if taken in isolation but the song’s real fire comes from Dave Dee cracking his bullwhip, slicing holes into the music every time and repeatedly ramping up the excitement. In reality, the whip was yet more studio absurdity from Rowland, achieved by slapping huge planks of plywood together while a beer bottle was ran down a fretboard.

The ensuing album, If No One Sang, is the band’s masterpiece, and is every bit the equal of Blossom Toes’ We Are Ever So Clean or similarly beloved cultish records. As Sgt. Pepper radicalised the role and contents of the pop LP, so it was that If No One Sang hung loosely on a threadbare concept – namely one prompted by fan-mail that imagined a miserable world without song. To this end, the album is bookended by proto-“One of These Days” (or even disc two of Echoes) winds enveloping both halves of the titular title track, which ponders such a reality through a distinctly haunted folk idiom, one reminiscent of the sort of thing the Bee Gees would be doing a year hence. Between them, 12 songs – “Zabadak!” and “Xanadu” wisely among them – push the group into all manner of new territory and a whole workshop of instruments, presenting something of a variety show as though Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky Mick & Tich had been made into that television series which was sometimes proposed. So just as you’re settling into the brassy “Where From Where To”, you’re propelled into the calypsonian music hall jaunt of “I’ve Got a Feeling” and then the Parisian romance of “In a Matter of a Moment”, almost every song relocating you in as different a milieu as before. And since this is 1968, what better than a character study, namely one tea party goer named “Mrs. Thursday”. Inspired by the Kathleen Harrison comedy-drama of the same name, the bandstand brass band the band fancy themselves as (and this is a Dee, Dozy and Beaky composition) are also placed in the centre of the drama (or lack thereof, since little happens), while cutaways to indecipherable ambient chatter (one cue as well – “all the people talked and talked!”) suggest a particularly deep “Yellow Submarine” influence.

“Mama, Mama” convincingly goes the route of compressed boogie with walking bass, ecstatic piano glissandos and “Keep on Running” party ambience, only to be sidelined by an increasingly Motown-bordering sprint through Tim Hardin’s “If I Were a Carpenter”. Not even these constant diversions can fully foresee the torment of “Look at Me”, an intense and febrile waltz where our hero, an actual and metaphorical clown, demands that you acknowledge and penetrate the lonely, brokenhearted alcoholic keeping up the veneer. There is something of the Robin Gibb lost-little-boy to his vulnerability, maybe also a splash of Anthony Newley’s happy-go-unlucky, yet it sounds remarkably prescient of the tortured high-camp of Simon Warner (while, argues Huw, something of Lionel Bart is in its DNA). You can almost imagine Gilbert O’Sullivan about to lean into the mic when “Break Out” begins and yet its explosive chorus packs a inclusive maximalism that would sooner rather herald 1970s soul, while the shadowy flamenco, intricate chordal passages and rinky-dink trumpet commentary of “Time to Take Off” help invent another contemporary (of which more anon).

Released in June 1968, the album missed the charts entirely; although they never had much of a foothold there to begin with, it helped reflect – on a different ratio – the group’s impending downturn in fortunes. Although many fans claim “Last Night in Soho” as the group’s masterpiece, it only climbed as high as No. 8 that August and the band would never see the inside of the top ten again. The public’s loss, as “Soho” was an ominous epic vivaciously detailing a criminal unable to keep from transgression even with a lover to tend to. The strings are laid on but seek not to comfort the listener but instead instill a shrill dizziness, and one wonders if this isn’t all a metaphor for something seedier, given the locale. When “The Wreck of the ‘Antoinette'” arrived in October but climbed no higher than No. 14, one could at least claim the band were battening down obscure galleries. Set where else but the ocean bed (!), its dissonant and formless introduction over which Dee doing his best condemned Arthur Brown booms menacingly over sonar squeals and deconstructing guitars take the listener aside and reminds them never too get too comfortable. Just as suitably, the song proper couldn’t be more dissimilar, opting for elementary yet salacious pop.

As the band entered 1969 it was clear to them and their entourage that their template was potentially reaching an end, and that the public’s goodwill was sadly – and unnecessarily – running out. But the year’s first new single, “Don Juan” (No. 23 in March), could be and was argued to be little more than ‘Xanatwo’, hence the disinterest. But been there, done that? “Juan” wasn’t really a rehash, finding the group not in the Wild West but 17th century Spain, Dee playing the part of libertine matador who would rather bin his demeanor for true love, provided this bull fall at his feet (but does he? This fatal ending is something the song has in common with the three 1968 singles and arguably reveals symmetry between Howard Blaikley’s story songs and the death discs popular at the earlier end of the decade). As usual, cinematic strings are incongruently sprinkled in to load up on enticing textures, pushing the song into narcotic marching band enclaves. A final single, May’s “Snake in the Grass”, also climbed no higher No. 23 and although inspired by Orpheus and Eurydice actually styles itself as what I can only describe as flutey ska. The superficial lightness is highly deceptive, since the unavoidable impression upon close listening is the narrator is actually the rapist. It’s understandable the public would be perturbed by this entryist pop (although given the slightly earlier success of the Hollies’ “Stop Stop Stop”, and slightly later success of Hurricane Smith’s “Who Was It?”, it’s likely they never noticed).

These were the sounds of a group falling apart, and yet the corresponding album was named Together (just as unconvincingly titled as the Country Joe and the Fish album of the same name). Rowland by now more preoccupied with his own Family Dogg, his only other production jobs besides the two modest hits were “Run Colorado!” – a plucked and orchestrated bluegrass sway that nonetheless makes much room for momentary tinsel that leave as quickly as they arrive (notably the jerky, all-round-entertainer brass and seconds of a foreboding church bell) – and “Margareta Lidman”, in which Dee can’t decide whether he’s turning into Barrett (“where are you gowwwwiiiiing”) or the Newley-affected Bowie (“got your leettahhhh”) as he comes over all twee and smitten about his new girlfriend. The latter was one of three Dee/Dozy/Beaky numbers, alongside a late and by now somewhat anachronistic beat exercise in “Bora Bora” (although its essential bubblegum is still not far removed from the sort of studio MOR with which the Blue Mink and White Plains would soon find success) and the not dissimilar, fuzzed-up “P. Teaser” (although the sensual moans of its closing moments may exist to pastiche or even demystify “Je t’aime”).

For the non-Rowland songs (including the two mentioned above), Dave Dee himself took to production and does a fantastic and eventful job, having clearly learned a thing or two down the line. The opening “Below the Belt” is tastily defined by its bubbly and ever-shifting, octave-jumping horns escorting the listener back to Georgie Fame and “Get Away”, while “First Time Love” repurposes the “Snake” framework of offbeat skank and toytown flutes into a simpler love song. Perhaps its two greatest songs are, atypically, two of its most stripped back. “Mountains of the Moon” may owe something of its existence to the Apollo landings but rather than go the predictable route instead exists as a harmonic, campfire singalong, squaring the 1967 and then 1968-69 Beatles (just how McCartney is that bassline) with “When the Saints Go Marching In”. Best of all is “Love Is a Drum”, which builds as cleanly and palindromically as Orbison’s “Running Scared” (or even Simple Minds’ “Street Hassle” cover) into a spacious, huge-sounding temple to sound (and love) despite its minimal instrumentation (as spotlit by the gradualness of its build). The unwary listener would have to pinch themselves at first though that the opening bass drum throb had not materialised through a time-portal from the 1980s, or from Ariel Pink. Is anyone else reminded of OMD’s “The Romance of the Telescope”?

All in all, Together is excellent, but predictably failed to chart and spelled the end of the group. Dave Dee left at the end of September 1969 to go the route of an entertainer and returned to Salisbury. The remaining members carried on as Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich for a further four years, releasing a number of singles that range from okay to excellent, firstly at the tail end of 1969 with the cacophonous “Tonight Today”. This’ll be a tale for another day, however, if just for the sake of trying to keep this piece coherent.

But although Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich are not considered – if you will – ‘canon’, any interesting spectator can detect how their importance and innovations have percolated heavily over time. For one, they invented Moonraker art pop, with numerous Wiltshire bands and singers looking to rip pop open and explore its limits following in their wake. The lineage next visited Brian Protheroe, who similarly went the Salisbury-to-London route. You can hear lots of the old gang (who he knew in their Boston days) in Protheroe, given his similar knack for stop-start abruptness, Latin rhythmic elaboration and unlikely musical punctuation. He’s particularly visible on “Time to Take Off”, but play “Save Me” next to “Clog Dancer” to see how veins run deep. And anchoring Wiltshire in the north would soon be XTC; there’s a thin line between “Save Me” and “Generals and Majors”, but Andy Partridge made it all clear when cracking his own bullwhip on the demented “Save Your Donkey Up”, the hoedown that put the West Country back into country and western, while bruised fiddles do their thing at some odd angle. London’s Cardiacs would settle in Salisbury in their later years and a clear line runs from the likes of “Bend It!” through early XTC (“Cross Wires” et al.) and Cardiacs’ life-changing mutations of pop.

Outside of Wiltshire, there are innumerable ways to pinpoint individual songs as forebears to later careers (say, the phased jerkiness of “Bend It!” foreshadowing Bill Nelson, Split Enz, Devo and other characters), but the overall template has particular weight. I could be facetious and say they helped bring about worldbeat – many of their singles visiting a different part of the globe – but that’s not quite right. No, Howard Blaikley’s open desire to make every hit completely unique and unlike the others – experimenting through disparate styles, influences, themes, structures – is the same template Xenomania would run with for Girls Aloud. But putting aside games of legacy and connections, Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich were one of the greatest and awe-inspiring of all pop groups. Every song a world unto itself. To those in love with the magic of pop, the countless ways you can lose yourself in it, DDDBM&T passionately provided a thousand entrant points, and once you’re in those irresistible clutches you’re not coming out. Hold tight.

To the Beat of the Drum: The Chart Heyday of Functional Dance Music

In November, YouTube recommended me, as it often does, an upload of an old mainstream dance compilation, in this instance The Best of Dance 93. It was immediately obvious from the sleeve that this was an old Telstar affair, not least since I have a few other releases in this series. Seeing as I always play them on sight (hence the constant recommendations), and avoid peeping at track lists so the next song can always surprise me (I don’t go to nightclubs, I barely hear radio – this is one spot where this rather base-level element of surprise pockets itself in my life), allowing me to predict the big hitters and the more obscure/forgotten sides that pad out the discs otherwise, this was no exception. Disc one gets going as you’d expect – an inevitable run through the delights of 1993’s poppiest Eurodance. “Mr Vain” and “Exterminate” with their side trickles of menace, “The Key, the Secret” with its bubbly reframing of 80s twee pop charm, “Tribal Dance” going for the stadium KLF/rave gut thrills, “Ain’t No Love (Ain’t No Use)” prophetically striving for a classier, sassier vision of handbag house that would come to pass only several years later.

And then, at track eight, the compilation offered up something ultimately far more unlikely. A record which, in contrast to all that had gone before it, wasn’t a major hit and didn’t sound like it could be. No, this was something very different, a little track doing its own little thing, not disclosing any awareness of the pop around it. I’d heard it before, but couldn’t immediately place the name. This was a record that stood out precisely because it sounds like it’s meant to fit in – that is, with the flow of a DJ set, rather than this mix of radiant Top 40 pop-dance which it is thrown into as though it were an alka seltzer of sorts (one to be immediately nullified by the following songs).

It was “Say What!”, a No. 32 smash from October 1993 by classicist prog-house duo X-Press 2, at the time signed to stylish UK deep house label Junior Boy’s Own. With “Lazy” nine years later, X-Press achieved a genuine pop hit which actually sounded like a nostalgic reframing of 1993 progressive house, but it was a style that never particularly crossed over in 1993 itself, given its less visceral nature than the rave, pop-house and Eurodance that comprised much of the hit landscape that year. “Say What!” – heavily repetitious, single-minded and minimal, reasonably jubilant but not particularly colourful – may underscore why. It’s barely pop music. How was it a hit, albeit a minor one?

It got me thinking about the sort of lineage that, as a Top 40 hit, I’d argue it to belong to. “Say What!” isn’t exactly a unique case of this style of shy, withdrawn dance music crossing over. In fact, there is a whole world of ‘tracky’ (rather than ‘songy’) tracks – cuts which favour structure and repetition, and reinforcement of only a small smattering of ideas, over more outward thrills. But more than that, there are releases within that criteria – X-Press 2’s hit among them – which are ‘functional’, small studies in rhythm and noise meant to keep the flow of the nightclub or rave going, not meaning to draw too much attention to themselves, and generally forgoing melody, fills or major structural changes. They concede little to pop, seem to largely exist outside of it altogether. These ‘functional’ tracks aren’t supposed to crossover into the pop charts, so when they do, they’re real follies.

The infrastructure of the UK singles charts in the 1990s particularly benefitted these sorts of records, where the increasing prevalence of first week peaks (aided through earlier radio releases) allowed gaps for purely fringe music to open up, something which – in the case of ‘functional’ dance music’ – had been on the cards since the acid house boom of the late 1980s (of which more anon) subsided into rave (ditto). And the thing is, little of this music survives. Just as much of the most mainstream dance music at the time struggles in reputation, from ‘purists’ to the sort of critical thinking that leads to guilty pleasure lists/pratfalls, the functional side to top 40 dance resists being made sense of within the populist context that it becomes most popular in.

ACID HOUSE AND RAVE

When house first started creeping through into the national charts, few in the know would have banked on the sound reaching number one in as early as January 1987, only months after Farley Funkmaster Funk’s “Love Can’t Turn Around” became the first Chicago house hit altogether. But while that was understandably a hit – a gorgeously showy pop song with disco and NRG syntax in its blood – Steve ‘Silk’ Hurley’s immortal “Jack Your Body” jacked the signal without any warning or explanation, an enigmatic and futuristic beacon of rhythm that inevitably split the public into those who ‘got’ it and, tragically, those who didn’t and were perhaps doomed never to again. Not only was it the first number one that Radio 1 hadn’t as much as touched in their then-20 years before it climbed the summit, nor only was it the first number one to primarily sell as a 12″, but it was a chart-topper virtually from out of nowhere. Hurley’s face was never seen (as he forewent promotion), his voice was never heard, all that there was is a demure piece extracted from the physical heat of the club.

Still, being a number one, it still owed a fair bit to pop. For starters, anonymously repeating the title in all sorts of semi-formed prisms is an undeniable hook, and more-so even was its central keyboard melody, even if it was more minimal and unshowy than may have been expected from a chart-topper. But it gave a firm, clear warning that from now on, crossovers from house and later its offshoots wouldn’t always make sense to the uninitiated. If you can pinpoint the sea change to any one specific moment, you can pin it to here.

When acid house finally broke through a year later, and became the pinnacle you all know it to be, in terms of the chart exposure it ran a similar path to Chicago house before it. Beautiful pop appropriations like “We Call It Acieeed” and “The Only Way Is Up” played up its giddy erasure of communal boundaries and provided a “Skiing in the Snow”-type introduction (only much better in every respect) to acid house for the great unwashed, while the redder cuts that spilled through, such as “Voodoo Ray”, married its hot-blooded minimalism to simple but killer melodic hooks (and even if the hooks were not melodic – as with Royal House’s “Can You Party” – they would carry a similarly undeniable friskiness).

But as a potentially much more radical sound to the wider population than any dance style with crossover success before it, given its especially narcotic bond and distinctly unrealistic noises that you couldn’t easily place with any ‘live’ instrument, acid house as a format was an open goal for startling the public. Fearful of advocating drug use, the BBC briefly, unofficially banned acid house as much as they could in towards the end of 1988 after Steve Wright’s smiley face get-up on Top of the Pops. This crossfire killed off worthy contenders like Paul Rutherford’s “Get Real”, but not so “Stakker Humanoid” by Humanoid (No. 17 in December 1988), whose success is astounding and could have only confounded and delighted in equal measure. Described by Stuart Aitken as a “harsh, uncompromising slab of raw acid house”, its mainstream success would seem unthinkable without the unexpected help of Bruno Brookes, typically man of much more reserved tastes, treating it to heavy airplay on Radio 1 (on one occasion even playing it twice in a row), as well as a similarly surreal ‘video premiere’ on DEF II. You wouldn’t think you were dealing with a repetitive track which exchanges conventional development for intensification of its unwavering bassline.

However, happening just outside the top 20, eventually peaking at No. 23 in October 1988 after a couple of months lingering in the lower margins, was another domestic acid 12″ in Jolly Roger’s “Acid Man”. Its success was an astonishing feat which has the power to startle even 34 years later. No acid house in the charts ever got further ‘out’ than this – all it really boasts is an ever-wriggling, yet curiously static 303 bass-line, a tinkering top-line synth that is so vague as to barely even be there, and a metronomic beat marching into infinity, alongside buried, distorted vocal snatches of the title here and there. It was druggy, not just a little sinister and made even less sense as a hit single than “O Superman”, seeing as no one was buying this as a novelty, nor did it receive any radio support. It is uncommercial in a way that perhaps no other hit single ever has been, and presents the central paradox of this strain of hit single – it exists to be enjoyed communally by drugged-up bodies, but as a track it is introverted and diffident to the point of almost total obscurity, and “Acid Man” aloofly sharing chart space with Jason Donovan and Gloria Estefan only brought out the sharp edges around its impenetrable sound.

The public image of house, or at this point lack thereof, led to it being offhandedly described as “faceless”, a tag which was aided by Top of the Pops performances where there is no focal centre, no identifiable star. The word stuck even as dance music in pop changed and acts exploited the wide-open possibilities of its public face, with The KLF, Altern-8 and others striking with their own unique and often outlandish presentations. But while at this point dance music – still young and not wholly assimilated – was still hovering in the air, its components not yet designated places to land, the ‘facelessness’ of its less adventurous practitioners just as often led not to spectacle but straight into ‘functional’. Don Pablo’s Animals come to mind with their reading of the Shocking Blue’s “Venus” (No. 4 in May 1990), which although ostensibly a cover of a pop song more or less ignores the song’s essence and focuses only on its organ riff, which it muffles and repeats endlessly while a whole toybox of now-kitschy samples (“yeah! whoo!”, “somebody scream”) are half-concealed so as to not ignite any party. It puzzles even now that it charted higher than any previous version (even Bananarama), while of course now being the most forgotten, but 1990’s Big Tent, daisy-age optimism permitted anything that in the moment felt right.

Indeed, at the turn of the decade, as acid house per the public consciousness shifted into rave, its core sound went back underground and other liminal sounds briefly surfaced before the steamroller of hardcore started seeping through. In this uncertain period crossed briefly cross through the well-loved likes of LFO’s eponymous track (No. 12 in July 1990), a cascading motorway that reimagines Detroit techno in a Cabs-reared Sheffield warehouse that was bound to baffle commercial radio with its Sellafield-amplified sub-bass (and with the awfulness of Steve Wright to consider). Other, unexpectedly charting early Warp sides like Tricky Disco (No. 14 in July) and Nightmares on Wax’s “Aftermath” (No. 38 in October) strengthened to outsiders the sense that pop radio had been infiltrated by some very alien music, namely bleep techno. The latter track, with its similarly punishing bass (FM radio was frankly unprepared to transmit such enveloping, blood-pumping sounds in 1990) and twisted sample of a tripping raver made it a most delirious confection. Although LFO’s central hook was an instrumental melody (albeit a very fractured one), the exclusive gestures of “Aftermath” push it much further from ‘tracky’ into the criteria we’re exploring here.

As rave quickly forewent the glacial structures of Detroit for the ecstasy-fuelled paradises of ‘ardkore – hyperkinetic breakbeats, hip hop bluster, samples gazillion, piano breaks and dousing gloops of white noise – the underground found itself in particular conference with pop simply through the sugar of its ingredients. So when ‘kiddy rave’ came along, it only spotlighted how hardcore fit the best traditions of British whimsy while simultaneously inspiring the ire of purists and eventually pushing the style back under the mainstream as it waited to mutate into darkside and jungle. Before that, very few hardcore crossovers could ever claim to be ‘functional’, given its inherently, incredibly extroverted character. But there’s still one… try for size Toxic Two’s Rave Generator (No. 13 in March 1992), essentially the most reductionist any hardcore hit ever went with its basic, reserved synth ostinato providing a backdrop to, essentially, little else – just some occasional “Pacific” cockerel clucks and rising-and-falling crowd noise. A breakbeat isn’t even used – rather it takes its fickle and decidedly concave rhythmic compulsion from Belgium’s brutalist techno scene. It shows hardcore had by this point become so undeniable that even lesser tracks with much fewer tricks to display could become bona fide hits. Before even that, Digital Orgasm’s “Running Out of Time” (No. 16, December 1991) came within fleeting distance – a basic vocal hook is barely used because spotlighting formless Beltram hoovers is a much more pressing priority (so again, more on the Belgian/R&S side of matters).

COMMERCIAL HOUSE

But as rave’s chart face went back underground, dance music’s subcultural point of entry moved back towards house. This wasn’t something that had ever disappeared – rather, the springboard for such crossovers changed, with the increasing prominence and importance of superclubs (Ministry of Sound, Cream, Renaissance etc.) being essential to pushing certain tracks over, as it to authenticate the occasional whims of any provincial nightclub (which, inevitably, still got their say). Rather than the happening-without-your-permission status of rave, the superclub – with its legion of dedicated followers buying the T-shirts and getting the tattoos – was something far more accessible (more policed, more branded) to the passive public. But their influence – combined with those of the smaller nightclubs that carried on through rave – was always potent. While rave (and, as Simon Reynolds terms it, the hardcore continuum) was where the happening developments apparently were, the mere continued existence of house in the mainstream was for many years at odds with certain tastemakers. And yet, just turn to Discogs and look at a whole community form around certain records, certain DJs, to get just even a glimpse of how these ignored worlds really should be explored, plotted and retold with care.

The basic house template – as proven already in the late 1980s – was ultimately one far more inclusive to the ‘functional’ hit than harder modes of crossover dance music. House was a very flexible framework, ready to carry anything from the most open-throated, sassiest diva anthem to nerdy, introverted studies in rhythm. Through the latter category was how the aforesaid “Say What!” hit the top 40 and how many, many others would as well. These are the wallflowers of pop, the modest guests of the charts. Introverted, unornamented, shy. They feel contextually eccentric through their essential un-eccentricity. Mostly or always instrumental, any included vocal would be some window-dressing chant at the most.

In as early as late 1992, a ‘functional’ club crossover such as TC 1992’s “Funky Guitar” (No. 40 in November) could almost entirely elude radio play. There is little to nothing in the mix that would have caught the ear of the unsuspecting non-clubber, let alone the titular ‘funky guitar’ (which doesn’t look to ignite the party but rather to sit atmospherically in the centre). What may surprise is that it, an acknowledged club classic at the time, could easily have charted higher – and we are speaking about a seven-minute track here (although a shorter edit did make it onto contemporary compilations). It was even possible for a track with an overt novelty, one that rendered it essentially kiddy rave from the outside, to be all inwards-looking and frugal (as was the case with H.W.A.’s Sonic-riding “Supersonic”, No. 33 in 1992).

Also key to many of these tracks are their palindromic nature and negation of build or structural development. Clock X-Press 2’s next tiptoeing into the top 40, “The Sound” (No. 38, March 1996), every bit as unembellished and subdued as their first hit was. By the mid-1990s, the likeliness of the ‘functional’ hit was higher as the megaclub era was in full swing, and some could even chart particularly high, which even now seems unexplainable given their distinctly un-pop nature. The Ethics’ “To the Beat of the Drum (La Luna)” was a most unassuming No. 13 hit in November 1995; at the time a beloved hardbag number, it’d sound impossibly more at home in a club mix given its lack of melody or expansion. Your lot is mostly a distant beat and open-ended synthline, rendering its vocal chant particularly nebulous and squiggles of wah-wah guitar barely noticeable.

Only months later in February 1996, Alcatraz went one higher with “Give Me Luv” (No. 12), a gorgeous US tech-house cut that although typically no-frills still moves in seductive ways anyhow, with its fiesta rhythms and cavernous synths. Radio 1 listeners in almost certainly never got this stuck in their heads, and yet it is classy in all the right, rather than reductive ways. While all these winsome slices of ‘functional’ dance were happening in the most unlikely of arenas, their stage was shared by a few particularly fierce records, like DJ Misjah & DJ Tim’s immortal “Access” (No. 16 in March), which ramped up the tempo and gave the public a flash of unvarnished, grimy mid-1990s acid techno. Both a rave and club favourite (particularly in the north), its lack of pop characteristics (even the vocal edit is Wink-esque cryptic) is almost made up for in that area by the impulse of its speed and oversaturated 303 burbles which were typical to much of the greatest acid from the era. While as ‘tracky’ as these things come, “Access” is too almighty to be considered ‘functional’ per say, but it used the same transmitters as Alcatraz and The Ethics, and surely perplexed radio listeners and TOTP watchers to similar effect.

If any one producer repeated the ‘functional’ trick to great success, it was the prestigious Tall Paul. Under his Escrima guise, “Train of Thought” reached No. 36 in February 1995 off the back of some serious support from the ‘right’ people (Pete Tong, Paul Oakenfold), even though it boasts only the fewest of elements – symmetrical bars of rhythm and SFX trimming with a vague synthline. After cracking the top five in early 1998 as Camisra with the airhorn-laden “Let Me Show You” – rather uncommercial, but more for the wonky, rave-derived power of its imposing, mechanical hooks than because of any meekness – his less successful follow-ups jotted him back into the wilderness. “Feel the Beat” (No. 32 that July) is even less approachable to those not into dance music, containing just a cliched title hook, timid synth vamps and elementary beats – although a shrill string note hangs above the track to give the illusion of suspense. Follow-up “Clap Your Hands” reached No. 34 in May 1999 and once again the rule is bangingness first, pop appeal a distant second. Admittedly there is a slight innovation here – namely that the tempo is fast enough to make this feel like hard house, ditto the pitched-up B-boy hollers – but this is still very undecorated club music. A similarly named minor hit, Big Room Girl’s “Raise Your Hands”, reached No. 40 that February and is Tasteful-with-a-capital-T house groove, stylish if predictable in said style with an alluringly unconvincing vocal.

In fact, chasing the ‘classic’ modes of house was sometimes central to these records, just as they were with the more outgoing house hits. Italian producer Vito Lucente, later of Room 5/Junior Jack fame, achieved a No. 32 hit as Mr. Jack in January 1997 with “Wiggly World”. Seemingly nostalgic for, as the opening sample would have it, “the true pioneers of house music” – an impression aided by its use of the old Chuck Roberts ‘jack is the one’ speech (most famously used on Fingers Inc.’s “Can You Feel It”) – it is ultimately little more than a slightly funky bassline and some minor disco flourishes. This sort of blankness fascinates me to no end (I mean, this was a top 40 hit?) There is arguably a lineage of this in the charts that goes back further than modern house music, right back to what is arguably the first ever ‘functional’ dance hit – Norwegian band Titanic’s 1971 No. 5 hit “Sultana”, a slinky, unassuming near-instrumental of Latin syncopation, hushed bass and the odd chant here and there that was popular in nightclubs in the UK, Europe and America (most notably New York gay disco Tamburlaine). A sense of bassy groove permeates through crossover dance music, and it goes right through Silver Convention and takes us into Mr. Jack and beyond.

Sometimes, a ‘functional’ dance track will achieve its success partly through it being a follow-up to a much more commercial, not to say successful, release. The BlueBoy were probably destined to be a typically faceless house one-hit-wonder with “Remember Me” in February 1997, and so it proved; the prolonged (by six months) sequel “Sandman” managed only to reach No. 25 and it isn’t exactly hard to understand why – making more of its vocal sample than most of the tracks here, it still seems just as impulsively low-key as its functional brethren, never quite knowing how to draw attention to its tasteful soul chants, rudimentary breakbeat or other background paraphernalia.

Or there’ll be one that precedes a big hit. Three years before “Groovejet”, Italy’s own Spiller tasted (minor) success under the alias Laguna in November 1997 with the No. 40 hit “Spiller from Rio (Do It Easy)”, which deploys a casual funk bassline and plenty of favela carnival flavours; although, this being the 1990s, the use of Brazilian batucada as a tropical rhythmic framework was a trope in and of itself – going back to the Good Men’s “Give It Up” (No. 5 in 1993) – none of the others (and there were many) were quite as basic as Laguna, whose brief and gentle tickles of cuíca in the middle distance are the closest it gets to catchy. It corners deep house territory, as does DJ Eric’s “We Are Love” (No. 37 in February 1999), which obfuscates its one love platitudes – ergo only real crossover qualities – under workaday bassiness (which is certainly no bad thing in and of itself. In fact, it compares favourably with practitioners of the deepest ascetic French house, say Motorbass).

ALBUM HOUSE

Not all the pop-resistant dance music in the notional mainstream came from nightclubs. Far more credible to indie kids and mainstream tastemakers were hits from an altogether more open-ended stock – the partial outgrowth of rave into ambient house/dub/techno and related strains. While initially characteristic of ‘chill out’ comedown sets at nightclubs like Heaven during Oakenfold’s Land of Oz nights, by the time ambient dance became surprisingly vogueish in 1992-93 it ran parallel to the concurrent ‘home listening’ techno and birth of IDM; that’s to say, they were both album-oriented, spliff-friendly, plugging themselves into the signifiers of their 1970s forebears and other classic rock music. This all meant that the tracky/functional spectrums of dance music in the charts could be achieved through completely different means, selling to a largely different audience.

As surprising now as it was then, the Orb topped the albums chart in July 1992, helpfully with their best record, U.F.Orb. If you’d place your money on them having either a number one album or single you’d go with the former because beyond live sets that was their inherent orientation (indeed, it was the first instrumental, ahem, “prog” double album at the summit since the all-but-forgotten Sky 2 twelve years earlier). But to release a 40-minute single, “Blue Room”, in a McLaren/ZTT/KLF-ish attempt to catch the charts off-guard – seeing as they had just recently expanded the eligible total-playing length of a single to 40 minutes – played their central mischiefs plainly. It got as far as No. 8, however, because they thoughtfully created a 7″ edit that they were invited to perform on Top of the Pops (I say ‘perform’, they just played chess in spacesuits whilst the beat went on – making it clear the endurance of British fancifulness in pop passed as much to them as it did to kiddy rave). Even in 1992, several years after the emergence of Balearic’s winsome emptiness, specific comedown music and chill-out sets, the idea of a top ten hit that emphasises atmosphere and journey over destination (its hookiest implements are ethereal, wordless vocals, whilst its centre is a deliciously simple Jah Wobble bassline) mightn’t have been bankable. Yet suddenly, ambient dub was in the top ten, having for a time reached audiences far beyond clubbers and music mag obsessives. Yet as with, for instance, the first dub track to breach the top ten (Rupie Edwards’ “Ire Feelings (Skenga)” in October 1974), a clear infrastructure – namely house and rave, rather than reggae – was there to support its appearance, not make it jar to the masses so much (thus allowing the disengaged to spin it as a novelty if they wish).

What makes less sense, however, was the similar reception afforded the Orb’s next single, which in the context of the charts comes across like their true avant-garde ace. “Assassin” may just be the most extreme example of ambient music to ever crack the top 100, let alone the top 20; yet in October 1992, this relatively forgotten impressionist piece reached No. 12. It’s a truly bottomless tonic, not even treating the unwary listener to a plumping, dubwise bassline like the previous single. Its sparseness is underscored by how decisively curious in mood it is, with nothing resembling a hook within miles. Like “Acid Man”, the wholly inaccessible sound of “Assassin”, sounding like it is unaware of anything or anyone else in the world, even the existence of the listener, makes the extent of its success staggering even today. It’s as if secretly tuning into an extraterrestrial ritual.

By 1995, ambient fervor may have passed its peak but the structure of the charts was shifting rapidly, affording fanbase-oriented hits automatic weight, with first week peaks now being the norm given the increasing gestation period between radio release and commercial release. The Orb had a dedicated fanbase and this may explain “Oxbow Lakes” spending a week at No. 38 in April 1995, despite being potentially the most formless hit single in history. Running for seven and a half fidgeting minutes, this anti-epic initially attempts melody – or at least tries to remember melodies are a thing that exist – but instead settles comfortably elsewhere, clinging to a obtuse, somewhat shapeless piano phrase that ultimately gets buried beneath an indecisive groove, before the whole track blooms in an adjacent open-air atmosphere of collaged sound effects. The track ignores club appeal altogether, given its disregard of rhythm or continuity, instead being determined – in its in distinctly meek way – on being one of psychedelia’s unlikely chart triumphs. After all, making the top 40 alone meant Radio 1 had to at least give it the time of day once, during their chart rundown, and to pop ears this was a soundscape at best.

However, higher up the charts that week, at No. 22, was the similarly obtuse “The Far-Out Son of Lung and The Ramblings of a Mad Man” by The Future Sound of London. When FSOL made their chart debut three years earlier with the deathless “Papua New Guinea” – neatly also peaking at No. 22 – they were clearly a rave act, albeit one keeping a very psychedelic eye on atmospherics, texture and the big chill, an angle the track accelerated from the duo’s earlier, more obviously body-minded cuts. Inevitably and quickly, their techno-kinetic elements largely fell off and they became divisive forebears of IDM, or ‘home listening’ dance music, more the reserve of dorm room stoners than E rush ravers. Far from necessary as it is to run-down the history of IDM and intelligent techno just to talk about some esoteric hit singles, I shan’t, but The Future Sound were proggier than most of their apparent peers, or as Simon Reynolds had called them, “pseudo-progressives”. In the eyes of the unsympathetic they apparently did to techno what ELP apparently did to rock, with their wilful abstractions, misapplied pretensions for ‘innovation’ and conscious avoiding of the ‘trappings’ of techno or ‘predictable’ sampling (reflected not only in their music but their Buggy G. Riphead artwork and videos). But I’m inevitably drawn to what now stands as their none-more-1990s iconography and reach/outreach… I mean, the retro-futuristic value you can now attach to a project like ISDN – a compilation of live, nascent ISDN radio broadcasts – is off the charts. They, to be charitable, belong to a multimedia superreality that also factors in the saturated surrealism of U2’s still-dazzling Zoo TV Tour, Billy Idol’s ‘cyberpunk’ meanders, the CD-i/CD-ROM experiments of Todd Rundgren and Peter Gabriel, Jesus Jones’ maligned zeroes and ones recording or, if you go further back, the gorgeous pop culture collision aesthetics of Pop Will Eat Itself, Age of Chance and Sigue Sigue Sputnik.

I mention all of this because it underscores the lens through which I see, to once again give it is absurd full title, “The Far-out Son of Lung and the Ramblings of a Mad Man”. It’s a bit of chart mischief that works in a loosely avant-dub idiom, but belonged to the ISDN experiment so seems wide with possibility in a way that seems quite quaint today. But as a hit single, it makes barely much more sense than “Oxbow Lakes”; an abstract instrumental with a discursive rhythm, “ugh-ugh” bass grunts and shrieks of brass howling from another room. It sounds just as difficult and indrawn as most of these hits do, the difference being its inanely surreal, colourful music video (the style of which is a legacy from member Brian Dougan’s days as Humaniod) and its stupid title exist to contrarily stand out and then some. What the track actually reminds me of, of all things, is A.R. Kane’s “Is This Is?” from 1988, which inevitably makes me enjoy it a lot.

Focusing on two artists rather than especially faceless fly-bys underscores how much these successes were fanbase-oriented, but there were smaller acts that slipped between the cracks. With his ambient house project System 7, Steve Hillage – fresh off his work with the Orb – achieved a surprise No. 39 hit in February 1993 with the Youth-assisted “7:7 Expansion”. The record itself is cautiously, vaguely intense with its billowing beats, textural ambient restraint and trance-adjacent synths and modes, alongside surprising but subdued usage of the Brazilian berimbau. It was arguably an early (and ultimately rare) success for what was soon to be named ambient trance, but its repetitive nature and complete avoidance of pop-friendly characteristics beyond the basic functionality of its beat makes it a text-book example of ‘functional’ – the chiefest, finest such example in 1993 alongside X-Press 2’s “Say What!”

CROSSOVER TRANCE

If anything signals the decline of this style of hit, it’s the arrival of trance and its siblings as something of the dominant – or co-dominant, at any rate – crossover style of superclub dance music in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Where house at its most basically functional could disregard melody and structural development altogether, the showiness of trance was part of its inherent DNA. Melodic, even often melancholic washes of synth were its crux, its rhythmic lexicon centred on the layering of big-room textures, bringing stadium-sized dynamics to even the smallest of provincial nighters.

The writing had arguably been on the wall as early as 1996, when trance in its most recognisable form had started to make gateways into the European pop charts via the proggy ambience (if not total plunge into Pure Moods new age) of dream trance, with its synths at once so glum and euphoric and the classical pianos central to many of its iconic tracks a sort of icy, inverted nostalgia for Balearic beat’s halcyonic chill. And yet, even if the iconographic melody of Robert Miles’ breakout hit “Children” destined it for major success worldwide (and although the UK was one of the only European countries where, amid strong competition, it didn’t reach number one, it still ended up the year’s eighth-biggest seller), once the gates were open, far more open-ended tracks in a similar vein could follow in its footsteps. No greater example existed than B.B.E’s “Seven Days and One Week”, with its vague, echoing ricochets and amorphous sound, managing to break the top three in the autumn. This surprise victory for moody pop-impressionism, which can count ambient techno as a forebear, led the doorway to the less melodic trance hits several years later when the genre as a whole was a chart force to be reckoned with.

But, as hinted, there far fewer such records in the top 40 when trance shared as much chart space as funky house (or, indeed, UK garage and the other defining millennial club pop sounds), the style having this point reached such towering, Steinman-esque sedation that it necessitated the existence of sub-genre names like ‘uplifting trance’ or the repurposed ‘progressive trance’ (originally a synonym of sorts for progressive house, given their corresponding developmental histories in the early-mid 1990s), and there was enough “fake trance”, as it were, in the mainstream to still infuriate purist factions to this day. Really it was the lower-key cuts that could make any sort of edgeway to the ‘tracky’ or ‘functional’ continuum, as evidenced at one point by British DJ Space Manoeuvres.

His solitary hit, “Stage One” (No. 25, January 2000), is a highly modest release from the Hooj Choons staple, focused entirely on atmosphere; the melody, such as it is, is barely scratched in, while sonar bleeps, indecipherable radio logjams and shimmers of cybernoise freely dart in and out of the song’s ambient space like metagalactic dub. By this point, the Cafe del Mar-style chill-out market was not only catering to ageing ex-ravers but was in its boom years, with a flurry of television-advertised compilations going out of their way to appeal to any Briton of the era seeking a certain type of accessory to fit their contended lifestyles – in one way it was deemed a much cooler, hipper upgrade of new age for the more discerning listener, in another way it was undemanding, Grand Designs and Changing Rooms cosy, as though big wigs had been planning a remedy for post-millennium burnout all along. Suddenly, a thriving, highly-exploitable context for understated dance music existed, and a track as barely-there as “Stage One” moulded easily into this age of low-stakes satisfaction.

It was nonetheless a relative one-off. At the other end of the tracky spectrum would be the likes of Sister Bliss’ “Sister Sister” (No. 34, October 2000), an ebbing and flowing, rising and falling record that Bliss referred to as “neural house” since she believed it to be too trebly to be trance. But its far from chill-out, and ergo maybe not quite ‘functional’; front and centre are noisy synth-pads drawing out notes to such an extent that the vague melody they collectively hint at never really coheres. This combination of droning white noise and trance beats is nonetheless exploratory and unresolved in nature, surging ever-onward and never quite peaking or ‘dropping’. With no clear centre, it could curiously be described as somewhat ambient, despite its obviously boisterous facade.

Straddling the hinterland between both ends was Sasha & Emerson’s “Scorchio” (No. 23, September 2000), an Ibizan classic explicitly borne of the ‘progressive’ mindset but also a mutual meeting of two era-defining forces. Maybe Sasha brought the slightly melancholic underlay, and maybe its gorgeously nonplussed melody (which is barely a melody) came at the hands of Darren Emerson (who had just recently left Underworld). What surprises most is how the effect is not entirely ‘functional’ even though its core components are precisely that – rhythm, repetition and more rhythm. This sort of reductionist philosophy usually leads a track straight into the muted, unobtrusive corridors of ‘functional’ dance and yet its overarching, trance-indebted design means comes over very forthright. Perhaps it’s a happy ending for this continuum; having spent the 90s fitting discreetly into the charts, the spartan style of crossover dance music has now reached a point where it needn’t particularly change its skeleton to feel inclusive and assertive.

Chart house was not disturbed by sharing market space with trance, and as the two leading styles of “club music” – as marketers might understand it – at this point, they typically shared compilations. But by 2002 they were mutating; ‘trance’ as it may have been understood in 1997, in the Energy 52 sense, was to be supplanted by labels like All Around the World and brands like Clubland offering the hard house and happy hardcore-influenced thrash of Euro-trance and the closely related Northern house. Concurrently, the strain of house influenced by trance itself – a nebulous but noticeably dark and thrilling patch that also owed as much to techno as either, occupied by such producers as Tomcraft – soon gave way to electro house – the 2000s rebuilding of pop-house with timbres derived from 1980s electro and freestyle, using a dense, big-room production that owes more to trance’s version of melodrama than anything else. Where a primitive, innocuous forerunner to electro house like “Flat Beat” was quite occupied with enjoying its introverted self, the equivalents of the mid-2000s – from “Satisfaction” to “Put Your Hands Up for Detroit” – filled out the sound with tension-building upwards synths and often-unearned builds, crashes and drops, turning even the most basic compositions into mini-dramas with the subtlety of jackhammers.

It’s worth pondering “Flat Beat” though, to end this piece. Even among the ‘functional’ dance hits it stood alone; debuting at number one in March 1999 (and certainly none of its peers came close to doing that), it owed its huge commercial success not to nightclubs, ravers, indie tastemakers, but to a jeans advert featuring a headbanging puppet who spoke in bass frequencies. Far from the sound of club tribalists or Radio 1 Essential Mixes, it was a dance number one that baffled even the domestic substructure and culture that had given dance music a home, let alone the usual Rods, Janes and Freddies who complained that it “wasn’t music”. An endlessly repeating Korg squiggle that had come from French house but instead worked in concise, dry wobbles that struggle for balance, an elliptical masterpiece of tune-resistant ingredients and spaciousness. At the time, this sort of uncompromising minimalism was of an entirely different type of kettlefish to typical club crossovers, and looked to be a one-hit-wonder not only for Oizo but for his timorous style. Yet as the 2000s and then 2010s developed, styles that could and did count “Flat Beat” as a precedent – from electro house to bassline and fidget house – have ensured it a longevity that very little much of this music has.

But for the ‘functional’ hits that have not survived, especially those of the crossover house of the 1990s, they are a formidable reminder of another time, when it seemed any club style could find commercial life – even an inherently fleeting one – if it caught the ears of influential DJs or enough clubbers in the heat of the moment. These are little watercolour études in which a small musical idea is taken to its logical end point without much fuss or much improvisation, innocently cornering the boldness of chart radio like satellites before thinking better of themselves and once again heading for the stars. Tracks that sound too privately obsessed with each new noise or effect they bring to the table to do a song and dance. Music which doesn’t contemplate that anyone could be listening. But placed in the middle of the market, there were – more than their makers may have ever predicted.

People Marching to the Drums: Revisiting McFly’s Wonderlands

CD:UK often dominated my Saturday mornings when I was little. By the time I was a little boy into pop, the cultural weight that once defined Top of the Pops had systematically subsided into bad scheduling and terrible format shake-ups. For me, CD:UK – on days when I wasn’t watching The Saturday Show on the other side – was much more exciting, one of the natural homes for many of my favourite artists, including my favourite band of all, Busted. When you’re a 5-6 year old in 2002-04 (indeed, their first single was released in the ten days between my first day of school and my fifth birthday), the slightly – but never considerably – decaff pop punk offered up by Busted is the greatest thing in the world. I’d happily have lapped anything up by them, or in some way linked to them.

So in early 2004, after Busted performed “Who’s David” – that most misguided number one from their second album, A Present to Everyone, the first disc I ever owned on release date – on CD:UK, it was exciting to see James Bourne very unsubtly announce to camera, “You might not be ready for this yet, but your kids are gonna love it”, before it turned on their mates, a newly-formed bunch naming themselves McFly, performing what in would in a month’s time become their first single, “5 Colours in Her Hair”. At this point, the only McFly record in existence was their guest spot on Busted’s slapdash go at “Mrs Robinson”, found on the “Wedding” single. But Bourne was right, the kids – this kid – did love it.

In hindsight, it feels like a premature changing of the guard. A year later, Busted would be preparing to implode and McFly would only be in the chrysalis of a lengthy career. But what stood out then and now is how McFly were a very different proposition to their mentors. Busted looked to Blink-182 and The Offspring and brought scrappy, awkward teenage boyhood to Smash Hits gossip pages. McFly, at this point, had nothing remotely, vestigially ‘punk’ about them. Rather, what “5 Colours in Her Hair” offered us pop that was at once cleaner (because younger) but somehow more inclusive, looking to the flexible templates of bubblegum surf for inspiration.

And “5 Colours In Her Hair” was to six-year-old me what “(Theme from) The Monkees” may have been to my parents’ generation, a starting pistol as absolute and undeniable as anything. The start of pop, as it might well have been for many impressionable youngsters. Riding a guitar riff clearly indebted to what these upstarts might have recognised as ‘surf’ in origin, namely Electric Six’s “Gay Bar” (both songs also feature similar breakdown-and-startups), it possesses a real ungainly beauty, because in just three minutes it is immaculately structured for maximum effect. Ask anyone to name its most memorable part and you’ll get an array of different answers – the riff, ‘do do dodo do DO’, ‘nayayayaame’, the tick-off of the chorus, the stop-start verses – all indisputable and unforgettable. And sealing the deal is Tom Fletcher and Danny Jones’ voices. Put bluntly, they couldn’t sing, but they get by on their everyboy eagerness and sincerity. At a time when even Sam & Mark were considered a bankable pop pursuit, the instant success of “5 Colours” drew a clear line in the sand, as far as I was concerned. I had a new favourite band.

The enusing album, Room on the 3rd Floor, is perhaps predictably never quite as inspired, but it did everything that was required of it, thirteen further songs that cradled humid 1960s pop in a chirpy, C86/La’s scaffold. “Hypnotised” is Postman Pat skiffle via the Coral’s “Pass It On” (itself a variation on the Beatles’ “You Like Me Too Much”), while second number one “Obviously” is a spotless scutter of fallen teen pop leaves. “Saturday Nite” is the album’s out-and-out, unreconstructed rock and roll pastiche – a spotty, warty Shakin’ Stevens – limply tracing the adventures of an underage house party. An adult would have no use for it, but a six-year old like me did, despite a passing, passive mention of searching for drunk girls landing on the wrong side of the charm/charmless divide. Better yet is “Met This Girl”, a ba-ba-ba rockabilly number with all the requisite hiccups in the important places. The much-maligned Charlie Simpson vision of what Busted should have been makes a mawkish but strangely prescient appearance on “Not Alone”, a tinny, downcast AOR slowie with – of all things – Chris Rea guitar twitches.

Stranger worlds are glimpsed elsewhere. With the the title track, they even find themselves abandoned in the anonymous shelter of a cheap hotel, contemplating their prematurely catatonic lives as if this was This Is Hardcore all of a sudden. An “Everybody Hurts” waltz underpins the basic doo-wop of “She Left Me” (a version of doo-wop, that is, which has arrived reformed through Boyz II Men’s clingy, likeable-if-not-trustworthy take on lamppost croon). Where the song momentarily catches you offguard is when Jones turns into an answer-phone message (“Then I left messages after the tone”), to be matily responded to by his friends (“really?”), to which he cornier-yet returns “Yeah, man, loads”; a supremely dopey moment that nonetheless provides an unanticipated sprinkling of Dexys’ Don’t Stand Me Down, minus the Pinter pauses. The typically good-natured surf racket of “Down by the Lake” is at one point even slit in two by seconds of a fumbling dub vortex, as if this most earthly of albums was happening in hyperspace. But these subtle diversions were not yet expanded on. With Room on the 3rd Floor a major success, and first of two number one albums (Busted had never even managed one), McFly spent 2004 having a riot as could only be expected, and encouraged, of 18 year olds. Dirtier fingernails would wait for now.

With the successful promotional cycle for Room on the 3rd Floor complete, McFly entered 2005 with open goals in sight, and come March, with the arrival of their first new material – the double A-side of “All About You” and Carly Simon’s “You’ve Got a Friend” – they themselves were an open goal for Comic Relief, who for that year’s Red Nose Day marathon decided to split the accompanying ‘proper’ song and the ‘comedy’ song after Gareth Gates’ career-ending “Spirit in the Sky” on their previous attempt. So while Peter Kay disinterred “Is This the Way to Amarillo?” for school discos and Radio 2 alike, cheeky chappies McFly got to celebrate the first anniversary of their debut single with a song that today matches it for popularity – the two of them their joint signature tracks.

And already their impatience to branch out and take their audience with them was readily apparent; “All About You” is, compositionally, the sort of potentially schmaltzy folk-pop song someone might write on their first attempt. What elevates it, however, is the easy combination of their boy-next-door vocals and dynamic orchestral arrangement – not to mention the numerous surprises to be clocked along the way, such as the Angela Morley-esque prologue, the Spanish guitar and woodwind passage that is woven in when you’re expecting it to press on with its loudest bridge, and finally Fletcher and Jones singing past each other in classy rounds. If you’re not immune to its charms, this is like 1960s toytown pop meets 1970s chamber pop meets 1980s twee pop, a confluence between The Cortinas, Peter Skellern and The Field Mice. And with this, it doesn’t even matter that the uninspired tread through “You’ve Got a Friend” isn’t any good, since its absence from any of their subsequent albums, bar as its bonus track placement to the otherwise chronologically-ordered All the Greatest Hits, shows McFly to not consider it as up to much either.

“All About You” was the obvious preface to McFly’s ‘serious’ period – that is, when these young men decided that they should put any songs about being dumped by and large on the back burner, get out their moody With the Beatles facial expressions and compress their inevitable “from Please Please Me to Rubber Soul” expansion in a matter of two albums. So it was that, with their second album, released that August as Wonderland, they stocked up on both My Generation and Who’s Next as musical touchstones, wrote songs with more noise and disturbance on their radars and brought in Steve Hale’s huge orchestra where they felt it necessary to embolden their music. Their lives not being quite as carefree as they were only a year ago, this autumnal phase – comparable in the worlds of teen pop to the fantastic but prematurely world-weary David Cassidy of 1972-74 – was about taking their fanbase somewhere new. But this reach for ‘approval’ (from who? or should that be Who? I cannot say – but Zeppelin/Oasis film director Dick Carrauthers was hired to state their case in the Wonderland live DVD liner notes) fortunately did not mean shedding everything that was ever likeable or fun about them in the first place, these sort of moves being cognitively right for pop as ever (cf. The Monkees’ Headquarters or the Osmonds’ “Crazy Horses”), as it’s about enjoying ambitious young upstarts running wild like scallies in a sweet shop.

Indeed, some may have been slightly deceived by the de facto lead single, “I’ll Be OK”, which made plain their new Who influence in a relatively straightforward way – Edge-aping guitar arpeggios throbbing like the “Won’t Get Fooled Again” VCS 3 organ. As a song it lends an encouraging hand to depressed teenagers, something which should not be sneered at, just as many of you didn’t sneer when R.E.M. went down a similar route in 1992, but getting past that and the unlikely Graham Gouldman collaboration “I Got You”, about as bolt-solid as unambiguous power pop gets, Wonderland is ceaseless in its adventure. The subsequent single “I Wanna Hold You” reimagines Bo Diddley with Harry Robinson-style exclamation mark strings and cheery, Muse-worthy melodramatic lyrics about unrequited desire as a “neutron bomb explosion” – it’s as if they’ve condensed Jim Steinman’s IMAX proposals for rock down to just three minutes, allowing it to incinerate as instantly as it screams to you it will. It compares very favourably with its spiritual brethren “Love Machine” (Girls Aloud) and “Switch It On” (Will Young). “Nothing”, meanwhile, negotiates conference between skiffle and “Substitute”, and “Memory Lane” – the irresistible premise of teenagers looking back to their own formative years, lest you forget how quickly live moves on in such a short space of time – makes the most of the evocative album name with a floral “Isn’t It a Pity” coda that could potentially last forever if it didn’t fade out.

The fantasy 1967 double A-side of “Ultraviolet” and “The Ballad of Paul K” saw yet more unexpected diversions. The former song’s effortless meld of power pop and sitar drones (with further raga-like qualities underpinning the second verse) is too forceful to come off as playdough psych-pop – indeed, its made particularly strong, yet curiously open-ended by the non-sequitur abstractness of the lyrics and the typical eagerness with which Fletcher and Jones go at them. “Paul K”, on the other hand, is querying baroque pop (in its single mix) about a father and husband turned defeatist exhibitor of mid-life crisis, with not only lyrics that are funnier (if only because less conclusively bleak) than some of Damon Albarn’s character studies circa The Great Escape, but inspired chordal turns and a verse melody filled with engaging trapdoors. While it would be too easy to locate Ray Davies in its wings, really “Paul K” adheres to the grey pantheon of psych-era songs about ageing men frustrated with the rather self-inflicted outcome of their joyless lives – “Excerpt from a Teenage Opera”, the Who’s “Silas Stingy”, the Hinge’s “The Village Postman”, Rupert People’s “Reflections of Charles Brown”, Kaleidoscope’s “Mr Small, the Watch Repairer”, Manfredd Mann’s “Harry the One-Man Band” and many others. What’s disarming about McFly’s effort, though, is that they’re teenagers observing, and being unable to understand, these damning attributes in people close to their hearts. Hence, the song’s swooning harmonic implements really make you wish the song would end happily and resolved for everyone, even if it never could.

But the album’s twin peaks come courtesy of the two singers really trying to individually break through to somewhere completely new as songwriters, not caring whether they end up with overreaching results (and they don’t). With “She Falls Asleep”, Fletcher delivers a fully orchestrated, six-minute song – essentially an art song… just piano, strings and voice – in two parts that, from pen to paper to arrangement, one could even imagine in the hands of a younger McCartney, but even saying that feels like a distraction from what is really going on here. Fletcher nails his panoramic mini-drama about a loved one reaching a point in their life that hangs at the end of its tether (perhaps almost fatally, if you choose to see it this way) with cautious yet natural care. Getting past the fully voiceless first segment (no McFly for two whole minutes of a McFly album – but Fletcher could evidently score a great adventure film should he ever choose to), the song neither reels in on, nor tiptoes around its flaring centre too much by instead observing snapshots in time, with transitions between them revealing the underlying urgency – indeed, the song works naturally through intense passages and graceful horizons, and this is the fashion in which it wisely ends too, a perfect cadence to softly cushion the precariousness (“please SAVE ME, I’ve been WAITING”) that directly precedes it. Just as “The Rain Came Down on Everything” and “When Two Worlds Drift Apart” were to their performers, it’s quite an astonishing achievement.

Whereas, on the succeeding “Don’t Know Why”, with its cryptic drone intro divulging trepidation about what he’s about to sing, Jones shamelessly opens up about his father’s recklessness with regards to their family (potentially providing further clarity to “The Ballad of Paul K”) via what at first comes across like a valiant variant on the Doves’ “Caught by the River”. The catharsis becomes even stronger, however, once faced with a distinctly haunted middle-eight that confronts how childhood dreams are no longer “the same”, an epiphanic realisation that leads to an ecstatic solo and a photo finish unimaginable minutes earlier. That is, however, until the between-the-lines symbolism in its dying moments, when Jones spins a few spontaneous, acoustic webs in the manner of Kelly Joe Phelps. Just as his earlier solo was indebted to Isaac Guillory, these were the guitarists he was raised on, presumably by his father – the poignant subtext, as I see it, being he found the way out of his childhood tribulation via music. And now here he is, newly adult, on the grand stage with his guitar.

In hindsight, its quite understandable that I was somewhat taken back by Wonderland – an album that understands Teenage Fanclub and K Records better than most actual “indie” fare given a mainstream push at the time – at first, before replaying it incessantly saw it land deep in my affections almost immediately after. Such an album deserved plaudits, but other than becoming the second (and ultimately final) number one album for the group – keeping off Late Registration in the process – those kudos never quite came, at least not in the same way that the rise of poptimism afforded, say, Girls Aloud and Sugababes their (rightful) acclaim. But this perhaps works today in the band’s favour.

After all, battles about ‘pop’ – its purposes, its qualities – are together a very 2000s artefact, and I refer not just to the rise of blogosphere writing, PopJustice and the like. Dan Gillespie Sells has since tried very hard to undercut the easy likability of his band The Feeling’s repositioned 70s prog-pop – trapped from the moment it arrived through critical prisms of irony and taste – by adhering to the somewhat Nick Hornby-engendered view that music enjoyed by the masses is automatically one of melodies to be whistled by milkmen, while anything ‘difficult’ is inherently the reserve, and tastes, of the privileged. While at the other end of the spectrum were the charmless likes of Razorlight or, say, The Enemy pretending to be something above “mere” pop music with their cockeyed ‘social’ ‘comment’. There was Sean Rowley’s influential but misguided Guilty Pleasures mind set taking for granted that everyone shared his crisis of character around 70s pop, while The Guardian‘s music editor Alexis Petridis took a path as the middle-man, here to tell the punter how good, or not, this new pop record is, away from the bloggers.

McFly, being mostly critically ignored, never overstretching themselves or floating cautiously above their barely-defined station, largely sat away from this axis. And after their covert bypassing of the sophomore slump, they found they had made their point with the teenage po-facedness and decided to reconcile their increased spirit of adventure with, unambiguously, no-expenses fun. What happened was, during their downtime that Christmas, Tom Fletcher followed through on a recommendation from Busted’s Matt Willis and discovered Jellyfish. Here was a band who made culty, twisted, inventive prog-pop whilst dressing like almost overbearingly wacky, Machiavellian cartoon characters. In other words, if McFly fancied themselves the first thing, it needn’t come at the expense of the second (or at least, it meant they didn’t need to act all “cool and moody”, as bassist Dougie Poynter later put it). Combined with Poynter’s newfound admiration for artist Drew Brophy, whose surfboard artworks look like Jellyfish sound, Fletcher’s love for the memoralised San Fransico band filled McFly with renewed enthusiasm for themselves as they began work on album three, Motion in the Ocean.

As with Wonderland, the new record had something of a false start with a chart-topping charity double A-side – one track spotlighting a new direction, the other a formulaic cover – that far preceded the album. The group’s rote run through “Don’t Stop Me Now” is agreeable enough trebly karaoke, but “Please, Please” was the real break with the past, a scrunched out horndog pop punk number in the best Busted tradition. Four months later, in October 2006, the album campaign began proper with “Star Girl”, an unabashed pop song with winsome, if slightly melancholic ooh-woo-ooos that advanced the end-of-the-world young love of “I Wanna Hold You” into a new existence in outer space (indeed, the song has since been played to astronauts orbiting Earth thanks to their ever-precious fanbase hustling a NASA campaign). Motion followed weeks later with a hearteningly stupid album sleeve snapped underwater, the four members circling their new, flowing logo in a manner reminiscent of the hippos in the concurrently-launched BBC One ‘circles’ ident package. It only reached number six in the charts amidst tough competition and stayed in the top 40 for just four weeks, yet still sold enough for a Platinum certification.

But inevitably, this pop rebirth came with lessons learnt from Wonderland, namely the always-present need to push their own walls back further. So for every “We are the Young”, there’s a “Bubblewrap”, a coulda-been-Jellyfish number that pushes five minutes and has chordal passages to die for. “Sorry’s Not Good Enough” and “Little Joanna” slightly evoke such forgotten luminaries as The Mommyheads or the Sugarplastics. “Friday Night” goes the route of “The Show” by battling two choruses against each other, yet teeters on the edge of incineration with its demented “Think i’m gonna lose it lose it lose it” refrain, which becomes increasingly staccato and jerky, like Phil Collins’ humanoid “We-know!-we-know!” from “Whodunnit” has resurfaced in the most unlikely (or maybe not so unlikely) place. “Home Is Where the Heart Is” is pure heartland rock/dumb campfire singalong that effectively deploys every trick in the book.

The Jellyfish template is not only amplified but revitalised, or maybe even improved, on “Transylvania”. Never mind just being this band’s best record, it may just be power pop’s finest ever hour (sez me) and the song McFly, a band so nerdy they named themselves after another nerd, were always destined to make. Falling shamelessly into theatric, 1970s art-rock worship, a de-and-reconstructed, lovingly impenetrable, absurdist splatter of Queen, 10cc, Roy Wood and Sparks, every move it makes is absolutely the right one – its baroque/Shakespearean tragedy panache, Wagnerian Greek chorus bridges, a storming second verse of heart attack melodrama, three-way call-and-response Bismillahs and getting Poynter, the weedy voiced bassist, to sing the chorus. It sounds so full of life, so vital, like it was a total riot to write and record. And of course, stocking it up with so many unmissable, outlandish hooks – many of them working at right-angles or as unexpected correctives to those they succeed – doesn’t half help. It’s the incongruent fusion of its near-total incomprehensibility and the sheer force at which they go at it that makes “Transylvania” the very best type of abstract euphroia in pop. Frankenstein’s beauty.

But one thing McFly’s giddy 1970s jigsaws weren’t in 2006-07 was out of place. The aforesaid Feeling provided Radio 1 and 2 with ubiquitous Electric Supertramp Orchestra models, whilst the reformed Take That richly brought out their hitherto unseen inner Jeff Lynne for their better-than-“Mr Blue Sky” number one “Smile”. Meanwhile, MIKA’s stage school Freddie poses were for a time ubiquitous, while Scissor Sisters – who were quite anachronistically 2004’s biggest-selling band in Britain – re-emerged auspiciously in late 2006 with “I Don’t Feel Like Dancing”, Elton Euro-disco gone right, as if to look at what British pop had become said ‘We’d told you so’. McFly may have mostly become a fanbase concern, as their chart positions made increasingly apparent (the double A-side of “Transylvania” with outright Jellyfish cover “Baby’s Coming Back” breezed into the number one spot in May 2007 and then broke the record for the lowest-ever fall from the top in its second week, plummeting to number 20), but they more than anyone in this era breathed life again into those allegedly uncool old 70s stalwarts, forgoing workmanlike study (as sometimes befell their peers) for twenty-something spontaneity.

The kitschy heartland/arena undertow of “Home Is Where the Heart Is” subsisted into “The Heart Never Lies”, the obligatory but more-than-agreeable new single from 2007’s Greatest Hits. The package was perhaps premature, but in its superior manifestation as All the Greatest Hits, it fills up a CD with 22 tracks, few of which are inarguably losable, so maybe not. It was their epitaph for Island Records, since McFly then inaugurated their own label, Super Records, by issuing their fourth record, Radio:ACTIVE, as a freebie in The Mail on Sunday in July 2008, adding the youth vote to a questionable, short-lived phenomenon that had already infamously befallen Prince’s Planet Earth and the album that helped publicly spell the death of long-time democratic socialist unit UB40, TwentyFourSeven. Those not wishing to indulge McFly’s apolitical ignorance by buying such bogroll could wait until the inevitable deluxe edition was marketed commercially months later with improved artwork and extra songs (plus a behind-the-scenes DVD that inevitably gets watched only once).

Sadly, the messy promotional plan for the record reflected the music itself. It isn’t a bad album, but is noticeably less imaginative and twitched than its immediate predecessors by largely opting for a streamlined, yet compressed Kerrang! pop punk blanket, as if the ghost of Busted’s foppy side had possessed them with a time-honoured weariness. Lead single “One for the Radio” was a lovingly supercharged run-off which boasted a cartoon fury without real precedent in their back catalogue, but that’s because it goes for the defensive in the manner of N’Sync’s eleventh hour hit “Pop” (a “This Is Pop” for the industry’s sales apex), given its bitter, “Only a Northern Song”/”My Iron Lung” meta sarcasm. After all, this is “just another song for the radio” in the ears of smug dissenters, despite how we’re alleged to “all look the same in the dark” (a clumsy if endearing hook). It’s flattened distortion and crackbrained, spiral-staircase verses convince where its yelps that “we don’t care” don’t. Months later, the ratty magic of “Lies” appeared with a fiery, staccato horn arrangement and oom-pah-pah circus moodiness (aided by the post-apocalyptic freakshow cautiously explored in its video), throwing the fans a rightly-timed, Big Brovaz via Muse curveball. The snag, sadly, is that it was probably their last hit single of such considerable quality.

The rest of the album varied in class; the unlikely Prince inspiration seemed to seep further into the less successful, also horn-clad “Smile”, which pointedly resembles The Supernaturals covering “Kiss”, while “POV” delves unnecessarily into Charlie Simpson’s version of Busted, and “Falling in Love” is syrupy acoustic MOR that could have come from some half-forgotten 1975. More bizarre, if entirely in character with their cheery pomp, was their attempt to rewrite “The Black Parade” as “The Last Song”. But surprisingly, the finest moments besides the hits are its most straightforward; “Do Ya”, “Everybody Knows” and “Going Through the Motions” are squarely dumb rock in the “Louie Louie”/”You Really Got Me” riffola tradition, a return to their first album’s musical if not so much thematic simplicity.

While Radio:ACTIVE initially reeled in more fanbase hits that dropped like stones in week two, not even that prevented the “Do Ya”/”Falling in Love” double A-side widely missing the top 10 completely (despite being a Children in Need tie-in). Fletcher and Jones later admitted to being conscious of their chart positions, and their later frustration in feeling unable to write hits was perhaps already evident with the tabloid covermount campaign; since Motion only reached number six, what if handing over two-and-a-half million copies of the next one for free provided McFly with a safety net so that when releasing it properly months after, the boys could comfort themselves knowing its presumably low chart peak (in the event it reached number eight) wouldn’t take into account how many fans already owned it. If this sounds cynical, factor in how they’d do something like this again with their next album, 2010’s Above the Noise, where fans were encouraged to register with a new interactive website for the group’s activities, Super City, with pre-release copies of the album included in the deal for the privilege. When the official release followed in November, it bottomed out at a still shockingly poor number 20.

And then there’s the matter of the album’s content itself, where McFly’s two years away might as well have been 20 years. Reimagining themselves as a Dallas Austin-assisted brash electropop outfit, ditching much of their gawky birth charm, it seemed something big was up internally, an impression essentially confirmed by the band’s retroactive speak of label pressure and it being “our worst album”. Of the two solitary hits, “Party Girl” was exuberant, in-yer-face EDM whose enjoyability largely relies on its stop-start white noise, even if it inevitably wrongfooted and tested fans’ patience to the point of it now being regarded as “bad Lady Gaga” by its authors, while “Shine a Light”, a blatantly Radio 1-pleasing collaboration with man-of-the-moment Taio Cruz, is chronologically the final McFly song the average punter is likely to know or still hear. But the sheer depths they go to in order to sound unlike the McFly of before reveal a particularly desperate mindset, and often results in lesser material. “iF U C Kate” is pleasant enough until you consider the forced, “if U Seek Amy”-derived pun of its title, threatening the song’s likeable naïveté entirely, while much of the album’s remainder slips by without making much of an impression. This is far from a band in rude health. And yet, Take That’s Progress, released the same day, also saw a successful pop rock band seamlessly sprint the vogue digi-synth-pop route, and ultimately ended up as perhaps the best pop album of the 2010s (or, okay, my favourite). I eagerly bought both on release day and played the latter endlessly while sadly leaving Above the Noise to gather dust.

In other words, the decision to play to that particular gallery wasn’t the issue. Rather, it’s that McFly strangely forewent much of their alluring panache (a quality key to virtually the entirety of Progress, with its winking judgement day dramas and klaxon-glam stomps and “oh what a BEAST oh what a MAN” etc.) That’s not to say it evaporated entirely; the aforesaid “Party Girl” is on-brand ridiculous, likewise the histrionic “End of the World” and album highlight “Nowhere Left to Run”. It’s these rococo numbers people were considering when comparing Above the Noise to Muse, then latterly of The Resistance, potentially partly the model for McFly’s new pathway. Then there’s also the laughably tasteless sleeve, a telling if unintentional update of Gary Numan’s Warriors (released at the same maligned point in his own career). Perhaps a charitable reading of the package – from production to packaging to technological ‘innovation’ (the Super City website) – is of a cyberpunk McFly, reminiscent somewhat of the 1993 heyday of garish multimedia pop (Billy Idol’s own Cyberpunk, Todd Rundgren’s interactive CD-i album No World Order, U2’s saturated Zooropa, Jesus Jones’ frequencies-only Perverse, Peter Gabriel’s musical PC game XPLORA1). It’s an odd place and odd context for such a Trojan revival, but to its credit Above the Noise did innovate one thing: as a friend put it, the 2000s power pop band’s regeneration into 2010s electropop, a soon-to-become-cliched passage taken up by Fall Out Boy, Panic! at the Disco and the reunited Busted in their hours of need.

Yet it spotlights the turn-of-the-decade flux that mainstream rock in all forms found itself in. By 2022, “guitar music” (whatever that means, or whatever certain people want it to mean) does not break into the UK top 40 undigested, not without having been swallowed from the outset by electronic, alt-pop aesthetics. “There’s not a guitar anywhere,” complained Matt Willis in 2017 of chart radio, “there’s not even a live fucking drum.” Regardless of how ill-informed this generalised line of thinking may be, McFly’s confused moves make more sense in hindsight than perhaps they did at the start of that decade, just as that nascent, slowly-fading-into-view generation of modern rock music reared on (but missing the point of) Oracular Spectacular and Merriweather Post Pavilion repositioned the guitar in echoing hallways of murmured ambience, drowsy synths and complacent vocal whoops, attuning itself to the increasingly blurred lines between commercial pop, R&B, dance and indie (certainly a conundrum for another day).

That all began happening in the background while McFly’s work became less interesting in the meantime. Another best-of album, Memory Lane, followed in 2012, containing new songs like “Cherry Cola” – the sort of Bo Diddley rave-up they’d done better before – and the needlessly twee, advert-friendly “Love Is Easy”, while the Above the Noise stylings were waved goodbye/pushed off a cliff on the Pendulum-lite “Do Watcha”. Another concession to indifferent advert folk, 2013’s non-album single “Love Is on the Radio”, provided them with a final top 10 hit. None of the quality control issues really bothered me though; it was nice to still have them around, nine years after their debut and long after cynics may have bet on them disappearing down the plughole. McFly then joined old friends Matt Willis and James Bourne to become McBusted, the sort of nostalgia-acknowledging exercise that effortlessly outdid ITV2’s The Big Reunion get-ups by being far less desperate and coming over with natural bonhomie – I saw the supergroup in Cardiff and a girl of about eight was stood next to me singing along to album tracks that came out when I was younger than her, probably before she’d been born. It only strengthened the longevity of the group, even when thereafter they disappeared from public life for years, the group having all but fallen apart in that time but never officially calling it a day.

And quite right they didn’t. 2020’s Young Dumb Thrills – their first proper album in ten years – doesn’t play to many of McFly’s strengths, but crucially it sounds like a band of old friends making a record on their own terms, free of worry about hits, strained inter-band relations or any of the typical riff-raff. It shows them in a less ambitious, contented space, which happily for their wallets now means the back door creation of potential Radio 2 toetappers, one of which – the actually quite wonderful “Happiness” – was enough to ensure the parent album, even if for just one week, a top two placing. With band members regularly turning up on light ent telly (with Harry Judd a part-time One Show presenter), they refuse to fade fully into the background, but this is the most comfortable McFly have ever been with their legacy, assuaged that the torch has passed to kids who never miss a chance to acknowledge them as a central inspiration. What better time to locate their past glories, and purchase Wonderland and Motion in the Ocean next time you visit British Heart Foundation, and turn even passing curiosity into fascination.

Synth-surfing with rock (1983-86): Part 2

SLADE, QUO, ROY WOOD, BEACH BOYS, JETHRO TULL (1983-1986)

After their commercial flame dimmed in the post-glam fallout, Slade restlessly made numerous attempts – through soul-inflected rock, punk-informed rawness and street metal – to switch themselves back into the centre of things. In the event, their ultimately momentary return there in the mid-1980s was the result of natural ebb and flow, Slade floating marooned for a decade until the tide gradually brought them in. Their unexpected triumph at Reading Festival 1980 endeared the band to NWOBHMers who recognised their explosive yet economic rock of 1971-74 as an unabashedly working class forebear. Goodwill from this permeated into a modestly successful album and then, quite unexpectedly, a major hit single in 1983’s atmospheric “My Oh My”, which debuted a somewhat electronic Slade, a droning, if not particularly involving Euro-synth hovering unmoored in the mid-ground. But as a graceful ballad it was quite unlike the Slade of old most of its buyers fondly recalled.

However, the parent album, The Amazing Kamikaze Syndrome, was quite understandably something of a big deal in Europe, while Quiet Riot’s success with a defanged “Cum on Feel the Noize” finally opened up a potential gate for Slade in the United States. So it stood with Kamikaze‘s still astonishing second single, “Run Runaway”, their only American hit and final top 10 hit in Britain. From its cyclical electro-drum avalanche of an intro, all “In a Big Country” flare shots and pyrotechnics, it is apparent this is an eager band firing on all cylinders, with none of that old bite of theirs spared. Dave Hill’s bagpipe guitar laces and Jim Lea’s shrill old violin emphasise its timely debt to Big Country, yet its thrillingly minimal lyric and Big Tent drunk-dancing melodies actually invert the template, recasting Big Music as “all things to everyone” – unadulterated joy as an ode to same, which was then rapturously received as same. Commercially, it was the happiest of happy endings.

Other material on the album saw the band play more curiously with all the new gizmotronics. A largely-drumless dub breakdown of bodiless vocals, inscrutable synth-matter and oceanic guitar wails in “Cocky Rock Boys (Rule O.K.)” initially calls to mind the carnal improv at the centre of “Whole Lotta Love” before a furious Budgie-esque drum barrage anticipates the bottomless pit of Burundi beats which rips a large hole into Def Leppard’s “Rocket”. None of this prepares you for the nine-minute “Ready to Explode”, with its cutaways to hacked-up, ambient race car collages. The slightly lesser follow-up album, 1985’s Rogues Gallery, is still diverting enough to contain numbers which edge towards Ultravox territory or – as is the case with “Time to Rock” – Kiss’s pounding, Julian Cope-approved “I Love It Loud”, a thwack sometimes not too far removed from the era’s industrial noiseniks. But most significantly, it has the band’s final great single…

“Myzsterious Mizster Jones”, that classic No. 50 smash, is as shamelessly time-stamped to 1985 as any pop-AOR you could name – Huey Lewis’ “The Power of Love”, Go West’s “We Close Our Eyes”, Midge Ure’s “If I Was” et al. Except its far, far superior to any of those, since the band seemingly reasoned that if you’re going to go down the polythene production route, and layer the whole song with opaque Euro-rock synths, you needn’t hold anything back, not in an era like this where you can mix everything so that tunes can still emerge from under the clatter. And so, with much of the same vigour they displayed on “Run Runaway”, the band throw everything and the kitchen sink at it, making the sure the song keeps going off like firecrackers, particularly with its heart attack drum pauses (“the Myzsterious [DUM DUM] Mizster Jones!”) unapologetically coming at you like Trevor Horn tolling bells. The galloping, thick LinnDrum beat works up the best dustcloud for the jolly screecher Noddy Holder to once again do his thing.

But what “Mizster Jones”, and to a lesser extent “Run Runaway”, are thrillingly reminiscent of is Andy Hill’s groundbreaking early 80s productions for Buck’s Fizz and Bardo. The latter’s “One Step Further”, with its distinctly New Pop fundament of heavy drums tumbling down the stairs and wigged-out keyboards, or Fizz’s highly obfuscated “My Camera Never Lies”, resembling “One Step Further” in a particularly brutal blender, stand as far-from-distant cousins. The ‘light ent’/Eurovision side of New Pop, with its roll call of seasoned singers and performers put in conference with future-minded maestroes like Hill or Trevor Horn, feels like an obvious backdrop for Slade’s rather continentally-flavoured reinstallation in the charts, and perhaps this is a roundabout way of me telling you that mid-80s Slade could be as creative as the more agreed-upon proto-ZTT Horn production of Yes’ 90125.

To bridge the two camps could have been Status Quo, who by the era of New Pop were beginning to solidify their position as ‘establishment’ rock for Radio 1 conservatives. This is unfair in a way, since Status Quo had been brilliant for many years and always played most focally for their unwavering legion of fans even as the band became punchline fodder for the smug hipper-than-thou. At any rate, they’d hit a big rut; 1982’s ludicrously-named 1+9+8+2 was the most lacklustre ‘effort’ they’d ever recorded, a far cry from their often highly imaginative mid-70s motorik boogie, while the band’s longtime secret weapon – bassist Alan Lancaster, who had become increasingly disenchanted by the group’s “pop” direction since 1977 – packed it in after 1983’s Back to Back (containing “Marguertia Time”, which he despised). Post-Live Aid, the Status Quo of 1986 could have been expected to run to the electro-rock security blanket, but they made only tentative steps towards such territory on that year’s In the Army Now LP. The moment carrying the most signs of life is when “Speechless”, a stock Quo rocker, breaks down into beatless chants and then seconds of a baroque synth-symphony as though their minds were briefly possessed by Roy Wood.

Wood himself had been stranded in the commercial wilderness for a decade by the mid-80s, except on that year’s needless team-up with Doctor and the Medics for an inert run through “Waterloo” (the original being openly indebted to Wood at any rate). But given that he was at the forefront of one-man studio manipulation in the 1970s, it only makes sense that his own 1986 album, Starting Up, was chomping at the bit for technology. It is far from Wood at his most inspired, and advancements in recording in the intermittent ten years had largely caught up with the outcome of his innovations, yet the music still impresses with constantly stressed thwacking beats eating up the lesser songwriting. “Red Cars After Me” and the title track are post-“Driving In My Car” pop, all disordered, mechanical rhythms with breathy revving motors, while “Raining in the City” sand-dances with castanets and “Turn Your Body to the Light” and “Keep It Steady” are at once mystic and quotidian, with South Asian tonalities beaming over scrappy, municipal beatwork. The latter song in particular goes heavy on the random sound effects generator (tablas, sitars, marimbas, saxophone, synthetic classical strings, ambient drones, fretless bass, dub echo), forgoing ‘song’ for stop-start abstraction, charming in its wonderkid button pushing. And there are few moments in Wood’s whole career as outlandish as when coherent songs suddenly magpipe-mindedly look elsewhere before thinking better of themselves and retreating, as happens with the momentary barrage of raga that splices its way into “Starting Up”.

But “Under Fire” – with halcyonic harmonies tumbling head first into a backwards vortex – is one of numerous cuts which suggest what the Beach Boys’ 1985 self-titled album might have sounded like if its contributors were more engaged. The group’s first long-player in five years was critically denounced from the outset and although a respectable sector of fans view it as the classic Beach Boys album template in modish gear, it leaves this spectator largely unconvinced. The finest of its handful of exceptions is “It’s Gettin’ Late”, which forces the best and worst ideas and impulses of the band (and producer Steve Levine) to fight it out over the course of one song. So although it repeatedly resolves into a lumpen Huey Lewis chorus, the verses are gorgeous with wordless swoons rising and falling shapelessly around the geometric, hollow thump of the beats and keyboards. These harmonies don’t sound wholly natural, more like their frequencies and pitches were being controlled theremin-like by a conductor’s waving hand. You’d perhaps have to go back to 1973’s Holland to find them traversing territory so surrendering and ethereal. But as mentioned, just as you’re settled in this ruminative state, the chorus intrudes to invert everything and steamroll over any ambiguous roads you might be heading down.

Another record that never quite converges, while still being a bit better than its pervasive reputation suggests, is Jethro Tull’s Under Wraps (1984). It repeats (and, coming as early as that, often preempts) many of the same tricks that these albums employ: programmed drums, abstraction, tawdry synths etc. Sadly, it plods a bit too much even for me, its greatest note of interest, or rather novelty, being how Ian Anderson’s Saxondale flute sits in the mix, its every whimper sounding pained and lost in a wash of misguided synthpomp. But let’s be kind, because remix (and I mean really remix) “Lap of Luxury” and you might discover music which is aware of (while being unable to harness) the minimalism of Run DMC materialising on the horizon. “Under Wraps #1” tentatively plays with the decelerating-into-hell vocal delay of the Cure’s “A Short Term Effect” (before giving up), the BBC Micro phonics of “Later, That Same Evening” are the most someone toyed with the word ‘back’ on a sampler that side of Moloko’s “Sing It Back”, “Saboteur” satiates both a baroque synth solo and double-time speed metal/”Overkill” beats (though they couldn’t sound less thunderous), the shortwave tape secrets of “Radio Free Moscow” and “Apogee” may betray an early Dazzle Ships influence, while “Nobody’s Car” repeatedly threatens/promises to turn into white noise. Still, when the highlight (“Under Wraps #2”) is the acoustic song that harks back to Tull’s wooded folk phase, I can’t recommend this arid mess too highly.

THE PINK FLOYD DIASPORA: Zee – Identity (1984) and Nick Mason + Rick Fenn – Profiles (1985)

When Roger Waters announced Pink Floyd had become a “spent force” in 1986, it was a feeling magnified by how everyone had been off making solo music. Waters had disinterred his abandoned, late 70s song cycle The Pros and Cons of Hitch Hiking and recorded it as his first proper album (discounting his much earlier soundtrack work with Ron Geesin) after driving Floyd down a particular dead end with The Final Cut (albeit, despite everything, a very worthwhile one – that’s my favourite of their albums), while David Gilmour gave a dry run for what ultimately became the band’s upcoming drained-of-Waters incarnation with About Face. Both musicians overestimated the public’s good will, as despite the promotional assaults of both records and their tours, concert halls were far from sold out. But for the two members who weren’t at the front, Richard Wright (at this point on lengthy enforced exile from the band) and Nick Mason, there need be no hassle in just creating some music in your spare time and issuing it on the downlow. Thus, both chose their collaborators wisely and set about doing just this. For Wright, this meant cribbing part-time Fashion bassist/singer Dave Harris to become a short-lived duo of Zee, and signing to Harvest for the album Identity.

Later dismissed by Wright (but recently reissued), Identity is perhaps best appreciated as an exploratory Fairlight album, in the same way Electronic Sound and Zero Time are exploratory Moog albums. Practically every strange little sound on this strange little record comes from the machine. Moreover, what disarms today’s listener is what the music derives from New York electro and Latin freestyle, where not only their distinctive timbres and rhythms are melded in but also a warm sense of digital spaciousness quite unlike that of Pink Floyd. This is unmistakable right from “Confusion”, a cloistered R&B number where every component is staccato and trebly, an attribute that only pronounces the large leeway between each sound. It compares quite favourably with the transatlantic, languid Britfunk of I-Level’s first album, at this point two years old, and I feel this not only because of Harris’ unavoidable vocal similarities to Sam Jones.

But I also consider Sam Jones’s voice to prophesize Alex Ayuli, and sure enough, when Zee – particularly via Harris – get the opportunity to accidentally end up sounding like a transistor A.R. Kane prototype, they go for it. This is where “Voices” shocks; imagine Dr Calculus doing the marooned canyons of side two of 69 and it may sound like this; Jones sounds ruefully abandoned in the murky ambient sludge, where even muffled beats don’t quite gel proceedings into a proper song. The only way out is the Horn orchestral stab-bearing easy funk of “Private Person”, a song which confirms the lingering suspicion that has permeated the album, namely that Zee at their most songful are perhaps where you’d end up if you took Loose Ends and drained them of their sensuality, the gorgeous, aquatic textures of their peak work, leaving confections that are confusing but compelling. The Laurie Anderson-aping “Strange Rhythm” – all wind chime marimbas, tribal interludes and indecipherable sampled vocal rhythms – confirms once again that the lite-brutalist constructions of Dr Calculus are the postcode Zee really live at. They could have programmed that drum to bludgeon, but instead it carefully menaces at a distance.

The rest of the record goes further out; “Cuts Like a Diamond” is all sorts of right ‘wrong’ness, utilising pan pipes and the most Woolworths electronic tinsel known to man. “By Touching” uses more Fairlight sample frippery to halfheartedly take you back to Yazoo’s “In My Room” while Harris’ slapback echo allows him to splinter into space. “How Do You Do It” ones again tries for David Grant and lands somewhere very different (I mean, slap bass) while the chintzy Spanish quays of naive slowie “Seems We Were Dancing”, complete with some particularly astral vocals, beguile in a cutely decaying manner not unlike a humble yet futuristic oddity such as Eric Lou Root’s Don’t Worry. It’s all very unassuming, happily sitting in its own primitive world, and that period charm is what best comes across from Zee.

Similar can be said about Profiles, the largely instrumental record Nick Mason made with Rick Fenn, guitarist with the post-G&C 10cc. It is at once overripe and ‘dated’ dainty, from the lurid prog interface of “Malta” to the disunited arpeggios that shape the Gilmour-sung “Lie for a Lie” (one of the few actual songs present). Fenn sometimes transforms the album into malformed Mike Oldfield, as though the latter was there trying to write Floyd’s “Poles Apart” on “Rhoda” and then prefigure passages of his own Heaven’s Open on the jazz fusion ‘epic’ “Profiles 1 & 2”, essentially ten minutes of disjunctive AOR cliches run through the charismatic Europrog filter (later on, “Profiles 3” is nothing if not one of those Celtic or medieval dancers he used to specialise in). If all this assorted but ultimately quite samey noodling is destined to go nowhere, the giveaway is the name – let alone sound – of “Mumbo Jumbo”, an unholy union of fretless bass and Radio 1 sax which is exactly the sort of thing that solicits vitriol in haters of this era’s pop, but also the sort of curate’s egg that inspires fascination in James Ferraro and other sculptors of hypnagogic pop’s upturned kitsch.

The Argos hi-NRG of “Zip Code” arrives to give that flanged bass the Heaven 17 (or at least “Money Go Round”-era Style Council) top-up; guitar and keyboard explode in isolation while an arrhythmic ambient throb drifts almost imperceptibly in the mid-ground. As with Wright and Zee, it becomes hard to tell exactly what path Mason (and Fenn) were hoping to travel down. Was it enough to simply do something, anything, different? In some ways this is a default structure for the rock side-project, but compare Mason’s 1985 with that of his former collaborators Wyatt, Bley and Hillage, and it’s barely identifiable as the same man that had once produced them (or indeed, the man behind Nick Mason’s Fictions Sports). Others understandably may find Profiles objectionable, the soundtrack to 1985 BBC sports coverage, but for me its impenetrable existence, a nut that can’t be concretely cracked, gives it weight, a rock equivalent to a neglected Victorian folly. Finally, with “At the End of the Day”, the real future appears on the horizon as Finn heralds the Gilmour of “Signs of Life” or “Marooned”. Your mileage may vary.

THE ROLLING STONES: Undercover (1983) and beyond (1984-1997)

Perhaps the greatest of the maligned dance-rock examples came from the Rolling Stones. I will readily admit that my relationship with the group is not just a little wonky, in that I tend to prefer them when they are at their least Stonesy, and the periodic tiptoeing into the trenches of psychedelia, baroque pop, disco, reggae, funk, deep soul and trip hop throughout their lengthy history dissonantly tend to prep my ears up more than anything on, say, Sticky Fingers (and even the group’s Imperial Phase doesn’t escape this almost comedically peripeheral touch of mine – I’ll take “Factory Girl”, wherein Jagger yelps like Frank Black to an Appalachian-Irish dry run for Vampire Weekend, or the extreme lo-fi “I Just Want to See His Face”, which sounds like it was recorded two rooms away on a 16th century tape recorder, over almost anything else). When they let the guard down for a whole record, as was really only the case on the semi-venerated Their Satanic Majesties’ Request and the highly informal, globetrotting Black and Blue (to this band what Wild Life is to McCartney or Diver Down to Van Halen), I’m disarmed by how far they – the apparent World’s Greatest Rock and Roll Band – abandon their trusted metaphors for the want to branch out into the great unknown.

So perhaps its inevitable I would gravitate towards the eccentricities on 1983’s Undercover, the final Stones album to feature a song that everyone knows, that wasn’t purely propelled into the higher reaches of the charts via a dedicated fanbase. The tug of war between modernist Jagger and bastard blues Richards famously left no one involved truly satisfied with the record, let alone most fans or critics. You can sense their impulsive duel from song to song, regardless of the none-more-1983 MTV sheen looming over the entire record. The Richards-driven tracks feel to this observer like cruise control complacency, a disinterested lap run of the previous three albums’ most habitual numbers. The ostensibly try-hard stabs at electronic relevance on Jagger’s songs, on the other hand, make one wonder whether he wasn’t at the peak of his role as the band’s quiet adventurer, engaged with pushing the band into perverse territory that Richards would never conceptualise on his own. What otherwise would have been the pallid Stones LP people generally regard it as instead becomes one of their most eclectic and animated.

Because, really, “Undercover of the Night”, “Feel on Baby” and “Too Much Blood” are distinctly, and unusually, experimental for the Stones, a triptych of outré genre excursions drenched in soundboard SFX by producer Chris Kimsey in repeatedly unpredictable fashions. The bullet-toothed “Undercover of the Night” was even drafted out as the record’s lead single, which wasn’t an atypical choice given the confident funkiness of “Miss You” and “Emotional Rescue” before it, except “Undercover” is much busier and riskier than either. Julian Cope semi-famously remarked upon hearing it for the first time that “they musta been listening to The Pop Group!”, and indeed it calls into question just how far Jagger’s NY disco exploits over the preceding years had led him, since this really does feel like downtown No Wave funk. Grounded by Watts’ live drumming, electronic beats keep abruptly slicing their way into the mix before dropping out just as immediately, while stop-start dub bass, Mick Jones-evoking guitar squalls and – most thrillingly of all – vocals shimmer, saturate, echo, appear, disappear and atomise at random, even mid-word let alone mid-sentence, in and out of a pitch-white silent backdrop, as if we were listening to Holger Hiller hyper-dub in disguise. If they were trying out every electronic effect their mixer could allow them, the surprise post-punk parallels continue into Jagger’s Burroughs-inspired dystopia, recasting Central American repression with threatening one-liners in the middle of the marketplace (even if he goes about it all via “Brown Sugar”-type narration). Plus, there’s the false ending, where a distended guitar falls into a bottomless pit of white heat before returning in shivering reverse, a la Joy Division’s “Isolation”.

Jagger’s easy-going carnality is decidedly secondary to the curious studio happenings on the dubbed out “Feel on Baby”. The Stones’ downtime reggae had by this point travelled unexpectedly far; back on “Luxury” (1974) it was blatantly crude, with Jagger’s hideous attempt at a “Jamaican voice” (“Lux-ya-REEIGH”) only magnifying the problem, but their relatively straightfoward attempt at “Cherry Oh Baby” (1976) possessed an unprecedented plethora of space (no doubt inadvertently aided by Watts’ stiff uncomfortability with playing reggae), while the mix of Jamaican music and funk on the same year’s “Hey Negrita” was more fluid than could perhaps have been expected. By 1980’s “Send It To Me”, they felt at least quite comfortable with that they were doing. Then with “Feel on Baby”, they finally stepped up their JA maturation and delivered a decisively forward-looking, inclusive production, whereby dub is even more an amorphous part of the fabric than it had been on “Undercover of the Night”.

No doubt, getting the increasingly prolific Sly & Robbie to appear on the track (and elsewhere on Undercover) was quite the coup, giving the appearing band members (one suspects Watts was out fishing) a steady base to work from. But like “Undercover”, rattling programmed drums fall over the real thing, whilst echoed harmonica nebula and ethereal, zig-zagging vocals (Jagger at his most oceanic) dash around the sonic picture like the distant blur of traffic on a Sunday morning. Once again, surprising kinship with post-punk dubwise’s sectors is provided, not least by the hollowed, hallucinogenic guitar work. Could this be the Stones at their most A.R. Kane?

But the astonishing, abstract “Too Much Blood”, supposedly Jagger’s most explicit attempt at up-to-the-minute dance music, actually once again manhandles us head first into No Wave territory with its mutant-disco groove, all ZE/Latin flares and Defunkt horns, with muffled, free-form sax scurrying around and above its chaotic conclusion. It occassionally entertains being a song, but generally stays preoccupied with presenting a rambling commentary on video nasties, taken via the absurd method of Jagger cheeky-chappy chatting to us about Issei Sagawa and later, via Alexei Sayle mannerisms, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (astonishingly, the Stranglers’ French lament “La Folie” ensures this isn’t even the first time a rock band went the spoken word route to discuss the aforesaid cannibal). This is just as off-kilter as Their Satanic Majesties at its most eccentric and free-rock, and presents an unexpected pop-futura triumph from these old timers.

But I’ve spent so long discussing these tracks because they are the collective backbone to the true jewel in the crown, 1984’s “Too Much Blood” remix 12″, where Arthur Baker deconstructs the titular song into ‘Dance’ and ‘Dub’ mixes, both blisteringly confrontational, stark raving mad dubs that posed authentic threat to the wildest dreams of Mantronix, Arthur Russell or Art of Noise, and were the furthest ‘out’ this band ever travelled on one of their official releases. When factoring the venturesome madness on this EP against the excessive pratfalls Bowie and McCartney were exercising concurrently (Tonight and Give My Regards), suddenly I really regret that I wasn’t listening to this ten years ago, since this is my favourite Stones release bar none.

A shame, then, that if you’d put money on Jagger going interesting places he abruptly shut those expectations down with his 1985 first solo album, She’s the Boss. Despite being masterminded by Bill Laswell – in the mid-80s at the apex of arranging dream team personnels – and drafting in an endless list of ‘names’ (Nile Rodgers and Bernard Edwards, Jeff Beck, Sly & Robbie, Wally Badarou, Pete Townshend, Jan Hammer, Ray Cooper), their combined matey efforts are rendered listless, the resulting album being lethargic and flat. Jagger and Richards’ working relationship continued to dissolve throughout the haphazard sessions that produced the next Stones album, Dirty Work (1986), which was even messier and incoherent than Undercover, the sound of a band falling apart. It was Richards, rather than Jagger, who essays this record’s reggae tune, a cover of Half Pint’s “Too Rude”, whereby the band (or at least those appearing) use its languid template to once again immerse full-on with the random dub FX. Routinely mocked by fans, its actually not embarrassing at all. But the album’s new batch of inevitable attempts at post-New Pop modernism are far behind those of its predecessor; the faceless “Winning Ugly” could be anything by anyone, while “Back to Zero” is less than Patrick Bateman’s idea of funk. I love how every Stones album tries its absolute hardest to sound exactly like the year it was produced, so at least these two tracks more than aptly do that job.

The parameters of this piece should close the story there, but I think its worth exploring where the Stones’ penchant for somewhat leftfield electronics continued ploughing on successive works. 1989’s Dirty Work shows a band on their best behaviour, trying to get along again now that they’ve found themselves a profitable heritage act, but not even this off-base attempt at ‘back to basics’ is enough to suppress the MIDI keys and processed guitar that underpin the loop-heavy “Terrifying”, the album’s solitary “dance” track, and better yet their unexpected Brian Jones tribute, “Continental Drift”, taken via the unusual decision to draft in (or rather draft themselves out to) the Master Musicians of Joujouka (recorded and remixed by Jones for what became the game-changing 1971 album). The otherwise unneighboured streams of Moroccan mountain trance and digital warbles are forced to run together in a structure that parallels the Creatures’ “Miss the Girl”, making for perhaps the band’s last deliberate detour into avant-ish thinking. As if to sharply retreat, they nonetheless went even further down the roots plughole on 1994’s Voodoo Lounge, despite the presence of Don Was in the producer’s chair, but Watt’s rattling, gymnasium metallics – exemplified most potently on “Moon Is Up” – turn into live breakbeats on the obligatory funk workout, “Suck on the Jugular”.

With Bridges to Babylon (1997), they found themselves back in a situation like where we started, with reverential Richards trying to undermine hip Jagger. The latter, infatuated by Odelay like most men his age vaguely engaged with happening modern classics as decided by Rolling Stone, hired the Dust Brothers to forge the Stones a comparable, if downscaled sampladelic makeover. Richards was having none of that and cut their contributions down to only three (again, draw paralells with the three experimental songs on Undercover). Two of them sadly show the Brothers boxed in, mere stylish window dressing to standard Stones pop (including the US radio hit “Anybody Seen My Baby?”), but the other, “Might as Well Get Juiced”, marks a considerable and fascinating departure; the patient, electronic throb (sub-bass on a Stones record!) and Jagger’s distorted, dozy drawl combine for something which many might identify as trip hop, but which I call a striking mirror for The Fall’s late 1990s-early 2000s work (don’t believe me? Play it side by side with “Dr Buck’s Letter”), therefore joining an unlikely pantheon that also includes the Manics’ “Wattsville Blues” and and the unutterably dissonant work of 1980s private press duo Wheelz of Steel. Richards was no slouch either (the album’s surprisingly profound, Jagger-free finale – “Thief in the Night” and “How Can I Stop” – are a pair of slightly acidic deep soul ballads without real precedent in their catalogue), but then I go back to “Anybody Seen My Baby?” and remember how the CD single was dominated by a ten-minute Armand van Helden remix. Getting unwitting Stones fans to find themselves listening to speed garage?!?! Now there’s an unlikely Trojan horse… Undercover undercover.

THE CLASH: Cut the Crap (1985)

And to finish, what better album that one of the most infamous ever recorded? And also, it turns out, one of the easiest to defend? And they definitely fit the criteria; the early Clash may never have foreseen it but by 1985 they, the last gang in town, had left a particular paper trail of rock ‘n’ roll iconography, one receptive to Elvis, Springsteen and leathers, which had made them darlings of the exact critics who had spent years in the sway of the sort of heroes they’d rejected on “1977”. What the early Clash also won’t have seen is that by 1985, ‘the Clash’ was something of a brand name under the auspicies of manager Bernie Rhodes. Mick Jones and Topper Headon showed the door in 1982, the remaining members …. well, you know the story inside out. Enough of the heritage preface and let’s cut to it, nay, the crap, right?

Cut the Crap, the heavily disowned sixth and final Clash album, a regular on witless, bottom-feeding ‘worst albums’ lists, is I think quite fantastic, just as Marcello Carlin and Jon Savage have been trying to tell you for years. Agreed, it’s not ‘the Clash’ so much as Bernie Rhodes, or rather, Jose Unidos, deciding one day that he was Trevor Horn and updating the template of what was now the Clash (Joe Strummer, who had completely only vocal demos before buggering off to Switzerland, and guitarists Nick Sheppard and Vince White, who although accomplished guitarists, as evidenced by the uncooked live Clash of the period, are practically multitracks of each other on record; Paul Simonon and Pete Howard were left off the final album by Rhodes). But as fake Horn was for a recipe success for David Motion (Strawberry Switchblade) or even the young SAW, he can be forgiven for trying, and taking a punk rock band and treating them (and that’s in every sense of the word ‘treated’) like they were Frankie Goes to Hollywood.

But therein the inscrutable magic lies. As a producer he was no Horn, and a conceptualist he was no Morley (perhaps he assumed the ‘myth’ of the Clash took care of itself), but in bringing out every crayon in his pencil case he laughed off self-restraint and played a game of studio katamari, fleshing skeletal songs out via a particular maximalism that cannot be easily brushed aside, precisely because with half-finished demos like those he had to work with, his expressed impulse to push music forward by mixing hip hop, punk, sampling and abstraction was too perfect a match, not to say an ultimately timely prophecy, albeit one shared by the erstwhile Jones with his newly formed (and at the time rightly lauded) Big Audio Dynamite. And so, with the opening fuzz-splatter boombox collage calling itself “Dictator” – there’s a song in there somewhere, but its smothered in logjams and atonal horns slashing at your senses – its easy to fall for the resultant “overproduction” which in a time like today, with hyperpop and PC Music having further attuned our ears to such wrongfooting clutter, feels only right. How long is it until Cut the Crap is seen and revered as the retro-futuristic crystal ball it is in appropriate circles?

I’ll bite my tongue with this album to an extent, because exchanges with me and my friend Evan Pincus formed part of his own essay on the album for Merry Go Round Magazine, but this is a (the first?) punk sound collage, a lurid mirror image to the radioactive grey of Mark Stewart’s As the Veneer of Democracy Starts to Fade (“Dictator” in particular sounds like the brutalist Tackhead template – whether that of Veneer or their own “What’s My Mission Now?” – gone pop). “Are You Red…Y” gnaws at you like a bulldog but it always surprises, dropping noxious noise-missiles unexpectedly (such as when the synth melody makes itself known a bar too late). “We are the Clash” has concurrent solos for guitar, synth and bongos, all doing their own thing irrespective of each others’ existence, just making those slurred chorus chants sound even more poisoned. The particularly head-scratching “Play to Win” revisits the arcade game pointillism of “Ivan Meets G.I. Joe” but almost does away with concessions to ‘song’ altogether, verses instead replaced by open lattices of ambient chatter. If the original intention for “Cool Under Heat” was another exercise in Clash reggae, what they ended up with delirious psychedelia. There honestly isn’t another album quite like this in rock ‘n’ roll. Every song is encroached by clangour and madness.

Then again, it was only the harsh, compressed sound of these tracks that make them proper outliers in the Clash’s discography. Never mind the increasingly outré nether-regions of 1980’s triple-disc Sandinista! – which has the Clash’s first gorgeous stab at electronica, the calypsonian robot prattle of “Silicone on Sapphire”, as well as plenty of dubs and tape experiments – 1982’s blockbuster Combat Rock is one of pop’s all-time finest bait-and-switches. Persuaded casuals lured in by the hit singles had actually bought a scaled-down Sandinista!, daring enough to explore Jon Hassel fourth-world tribal-ambience (“Sean Flynn”) and post-apocalyptic, radiation-filled lounge (“Death Is a Star”, which ends the album as sinisterly, fatally ‘cheery’ as the “Enjoy Yourself” reprise on More Specials or “Yuko & Hiro” on The Great Escape). But the difference need be underlined; the expansive dub echo throughout both albums, particularly Sandinista!, made even the most straightforward songs feel fitted with plutonium, and once that irreversibly ignites at the end of Combat Rock, only squashed sonic pictures remain.

On release, critics took Cut the Crap out the back of the barn and shot it in the head, but they could not hush its impact on rock, whether that was a conscious impact or otherwise. Along with Big Audio Dynamite’s first album, it did ultimately form the gates of a new vanguard, with plenty of groups in the ensuing years similarly taking up the baton and mixing punk, noise, samples, industrial, techno, hip hop, humour and politics (no, scratch that, bands that met The Clash and Public Enemy halfway, so goes the cliche): Sigue Sigue Sputnik, Age of Chance, Pop Will Eat Itself, Carter USM, Renegade Soundwave, Headless Chickens, Jesus Jones, The 25th of May, Chumbawamba, Foreheads in a Fishtank, Papa Brittle, Hustlers HC, Back to the Planet, Senser and Apollo 440. It turns out Bernie Rhodes did foresee the future and, however haphazardly, was right to tell those willing to listen.

And besides, Cut the Crap could never convincingly be written off anyway because it has “This Is England”. The greatest song the Clash ever recorded.

It starts with an offbeat, an intro forcing you to align your ears to the country’s weariness, and then once your ears are in you’re very much in – in a 1985 England of violent desperation, joining Strummer stood centred and addled at the social injury. To begin with the track is much roomier than dissenters would lead you on, and you can hear him echo ruefully into the beatbox, but gradually more turns up (synthesised jugs, guitar layers, ghostly harmonies) as more inexplicable things go off in England (and with the football chants, remember this was the year of Bradford City and Heysel), all inhabiting a seemingly irresolvable bleakness, those yearning ascending synths sounding more tragic, until that time bomb beat just peters out and the punk riff just squiggles off into the grey, no more. There’ll be no catharsis for the nation tonight. It was their final single and its closing ellipsis feels particularly potent.

Synth-surfing with rock (1983-86): Part 1

As eventually happens to all of my peers, the cosy doom encoded in our curiosity, I recently found myself listening to Lou Reed’s infamous Mistrial, from 1986. I was actually relistening, since I was determined to squeeze some semblance of life out of its (at least to me) alluring veneer, but it was a herculean task. Its pencil-thin drum machines and samplers were actually quite a match for Reed, who was on the offest of off days with his defanged takedowns on ‘video violence’ and irony-free sideways shuffle into 1980 disco rap on “The Original Wrapper” (okay fine, I do have time for that). But my difficulty is ultimately Reed’s lack of inspiration, his (at the time) entrepreneurial image, and how he pummelled his new gadgets into cul de sacs, rather than him using said gadgets at all.

And I must emphasise the latter point. For rockers of Reed’s vintage, it is almost a given that sometime in the mid-1980s they apparently embarrassed themselves by going “80s”, making an LP or two that replaced many of their musical cruxes with “dated” synths and suchlike before withdrawing from these paths at the end (or after the end) of the decade. The assumption is that their pained attempts to be down and with it instead left them with pound shop equivalents to ‘the real thing’, unable to keep abreast with the times. Sometimes I agree, but usually based on foundations that rightly suggest I side more with the sectors being explored than the apparent integrity of the artist; with Dylan’s over-remixed “When the Night Comes Falling from the Sky”, I’d love to have heard it go further with its dance-oriented tow, rather than wasting the presence of Arthur Baker, while I cheer for the even more synth-laden “Driftin’ Too Far from Shore” to, ahem, drift even further from shore, but it refuses to happen (let’s just say I have much more time for ‘weird’ Dylan than most of his oeuvre) because the safety net is too high, the attempt still too ginger and uncommitted.

Quite often though, this isn’t the case. Many of these smeared albums fascinate me to no end, because their particular mix of ingredients leave them far stranger than their reputation pretends. Indeed, the fact that quite often these artists are not ‘the real thing’ (what might that mean? Propaganda?) is central to their entrancing nature, as seeming attempts by ignorant rock dinos to fiddle with drum machines and sampler banks congeal into electropop labyrinthines of diverting fissures and textures, riddled with rhythmic experimentation sometimes bordering on the radical. Their ‘accidentally’ uncommercial nature is always, in effect, the biggest of advantages. Many of the records I’m thinking of would suggest the potent impact of, say, Art of Noise’s anti-rock abstractions or the rip-it-up-and-start-again manifestos of New Pop. And here I want to make the case for many of these slicked-up, but ever unpredictable records.

This piece is only about some of this music at any rate; I will not explore entrants which are actually popular (say, Born in the U.S.A., which is just as well as I dislike it), since it would defeat the purpose, and I’m also avoiding artists who are sadly too niche to have established consensuses around their albums (as still frustratingly proves the case with the great David Essex, but 1984’s This One’s for You is typically fantastic so search that one out). Moreover, I’m mostly interested in scouting the sound, rather than full thematic contents of these records, not least because the visceral, disruptive punch many of these albums pack has proven many of them unlikely – or maybe not so unlikely – kindred spirits to a plethora of music I’ve been listening to lately (Actress, Amon Tobin, Meat Beat Manifesto, Nicolette, Super_Collider and The Todd Terry Project, among others).

NEIL YOUNG: Landing on Water (1986)

In the views of many commentators, Neil Young’s 1980s had been a particularly rocky ride. Unwilling to stay too long in one place, he brushed past a sequence of largely casual albums that saw him take the front desk in a multiplicity of idioms, from hard rock, Kraftwerk, rockabilly to country, before just as swiftly moving on as his fancy took him. Despite their attempted lawsuit, there was nothing Geffen could do about it… if you couldn’t keep up with how Young modified his approach constantly and appropriately for each occasion, it was only on you. For album fifteen, 1986’s Landing on Water, the mood of the day was to feed largely unornamented, Synclavier-loaded demos into a synthesised workspace, hiring drummer Steve Jordan and co-producer Danny Kortchmar for the full effect. The result was yet another puzzling album that many have left dust to accrue upon. This is entirely understandable, because the music, with its inharmonious palette of sounds and contributors, doesn’t really sound like anything but itself.

It wasn’t without total precedent; 1983’s Trans marked Young’s first (albeit highly different) squaring up into the world of electronics. Now semi-reappraised (if not exactly Low), its continued puissance over time cannot be ignored; the manner in which extreme distortion (in this instance a Vocoder) is used to hide the pained singer and aurally symbolise a breakdown in communication persists right through to 808s & Heartbreak. It surely helps that, as with Dylan (and maybe one or two other examples to come), I much prefer Young when he is ploughing meadows deemed obtuse of him and anticipating different futures than those typically noted or expected – much better (says contrarian me) the proto-C86 “Lookin’ for a Love” than the grunge projections often observed and affixed to some of his other canonical work. Quite apart from the cybersoul of Trans, it’s easy for me to find a particular alien nuance in the album we started with, particularly as it seems to try to suppress it.

Landing on Water is about the friction between sound and space, and how to reconcile that gulf when you’ve cunningly made it so vast. Although it comprises the five expected components – vocals, guitars, (synth) bass, keyboard and drums – all are rendered tinny, trebly and dry. And never mind always being ‘at’ the centre, Jordan’s drums are the centre, the basic, sole functional point that tramples everything else into submission. These battered clangs of percussion, sometimes doubled up by beatbox skitters, are permanently far louder in the mix than any of the hesitant synths, exiguous guitar or Young’s quivering, processed falsetto. The result is music so empty and minimal that it completely disarms the listener, synthrock that has come out shrunken in the wash, caught in a different type of battle between pure and impure than Trans. Frequently, as on “People on the Street” and “Drifter”, parched drum tracks are almost the only thing there is to take from it.

But even within this unconventional template, the songs never beat down conventional paths. “Weight of the World” is a study in twisted rhythm, a marooned EBM beat providing choppy waves for thin keyboards to see-saw around, while Fairlight-y burbles of voice habitually appear at some odd angle. This unstable framework eventually saturates into discordant burbles of electronica. The disturbed samba of “Violent Side” comes at you like a diseased Red Box, its corny world platitudes and youth club chants cancelled out by the hollowness of its arrangement. Startlingly, the baffling refrain of “control your violent side” (the lyrics are every ounce as sibylline as the music) and would-be-AOR guitar solo are not merely buried in the mix but unceremoniously dumped down a 50 foot hole, barely detectable, and such neglectful treatment is similarly handed to the periodic solos on “Hippie Dream”. Young kidnapped Raeganrock and sucked out its insides, leaving only its prepped up husk. So where in the hands of others these solos would soar banally, here they are merely distant squiggles, atmospheric debris from your thwarted expectations. In recognising their ambient potential, Young initiated a train of thought that leads straight to the KLF’s vaporous sampling of Eddie van Halen at the cockrow climax of Chill Out.

The album works because of its every incongruent corner, as if understudies of Einstürzende Neubauten had been tasked with creating a straightforward rock record. The air of despondency in “Hippie Dream” is overtly punctuated by its metallic smacks smiting so hard on the beat, alongside shoegaze-forecasting guitar smog. “Bad News Beat” is audaciously destabilised, with particularly dissonant snares falling from the beat’s trelliswork in a method today comparable to SOPHIE or Arca’s deconstructions of nightclub cadence, an impression strengthened by the bubblegum of the lyric. “Touch the Night” attempts to swing but is thwarted by its own illness, something which also affects the ‘funk’ of “Hard Luck Stories”, while flummoxing horns even surface amid the scratchy guitar and anxious keyboards on “People on the Street”. Others have accurately pointed to “Pressure” as an early instance of motorik indie rock, but it still prefers to slamdance vigorously than to slide across celestial space, while the closing “Drifter” might even be described as exuberant, as if thrilled the album has made it to the end in one piece, despite it constantly sliding. What this all suggests is the intentionally off-putting nature of Landing on Water, sparing no extremities, allows a hundred different ways to listen to it, always catching other musical worlds passing by its windows. That, for me, is more than enough to go on.

ROBERT PLANT: Shaken ‘n’ Stirred (1985)

I don’t know about others with similar upbringings and music-discovery trajectories to myself, but I’d grown up with some assumptions about Robert Plant that must have appeared from somewhere, namely the belief that after Zeppelin, he’d spent years recording prosaic imitations of his old band – see Ozzy post-Randy Rhoads for a potentially similarly misguided parallel – before middle age forced him to hit the brakes and he settled into a retirement of worthy worldbeat and rootsy projects to impress Uncut, Jools Holland and Grammy boards, reawakening a smidgen of adventure in him. Once I’d actually bothered to do away with this anonymous received wisdom, it became apparent his apparently conservative period was littered with odd experiments and some distinctly unlikely stabs at relevance to slot alongside the more typical ones.

And so if Plant’s first two solo albums were unsettled, not totally involving ‘noo wave’ patches on what a 70s solo Plant might have sounded like, his third, 1985’s Shaken ‘n’ Stirred, brokered a far more overt concession to modernity, one that – quite surprisingly for Plant – caught particular ear of the more cerebral, fringe pop of the era. But although Plant’s intention was to give himself an art-pop makeover, he still chose unlikely players such as Richie Hayward and Robbie Blunt to make the record with, musicians just as unfamiliar with these worlds as himself, resulting in music that is not only uniquely swelled and skewed but unaware of it. Considering this was the year a sloppy Led Zep reunited (only to die on its arse) at Live Aid, the singer’s disengagement with his old band couldn’t have been bigger; he had never traversed such a different stairway to “Stairway”.

The record bears initial trepidation, opening with askew, formless instrumental shapes like a keyboard workshop warming up, until “Hip to Hoo” (see what I mean?) suddenly staggers with a distorted confidence, like 1985 synthpop that has been spliced and sellotaped back together in the wrong way, Plant and Toni Halliday singing shapeless vocal figures over similarly shapeless music. There is little rhythmic or melodic continuty, forcing keyboard glissandos to merely evaporate rather than set anything up, and apart from momentary synth breaks where you’d swear Tony Banks had turned up uninvited into the studio, the track feels like it has evaded a true human touch, as if OpenAI had been tasked with creating “80s pop” (cf. Kajagoogoo’s astonishingly featureless “Ooh to Be Ah”). This furrowing of the uncanny valley is aided at one point by Halliday’s chant of “cheat, cheat, cheat”, since it invents the “king, king, king” in The Sisters of Mercy’s Olympian, Jim Steinman-produced “Dominion/Mother Russia”.

This sensation of the superreal is expanded throughout the album. On “Kallalou Kallalou”, Plant takes a superficial glance at his “D’yer Maker” lovers platitudes and rehomes them in a soundbed that has little interest in hooking together its constituent parts properly. “Trouble Your Money” may take belated inspiration from the Police, but what cuts hardest is its largely weightless feel and ricocheting dubbed-up snares. The hit, “Little by Little”, tries at once to be and not be a hit, burying its commercial touches under a mishmash of arbitrary sounds and noises, while call-and-response instrumentation on the closing triad of songs consolidate on all that precedes them.

But there is no greater case for this album’s wilful obscurity than “Too Loud”, in which Plant’s expressed attempt to become David Byrne instead sees him invent Yello’s “The Race”, right down to his palindromic goofball rap, drumtronics and pocketing of dissonant MIDI horns (which, as you’d expect, don’t come when you’d expect). It’s as though John Robie was behind the producer’s desk; obtuse percussive hooks and cut-up sound FX are priortised over anything else this hubristic patchwork may have to offer, and even the sound of words matter more than anything they might mean. And while Halliday’s random grunts underscore awareness of “Beat Box” and “Close (To The Edit)”, overall the listener ponders how unlikely it is that a rock and roll singer who spent a decade sharing stages and studios with John Bonham should find himself channeling (a fever dream of) Tony Oxley.

If Shaken ‘n’ Stirred shares any DNA with the old band, it’s with In Through the Out Door, their neglected masterpiece of informal world jams and Swedish pop, wherein orange hums of John Paules Jones’ Yamaha GX-1 encroach bittersweet laments (the final twelve minutes of the album being the best twelve minutes Zeppelin ever recorded) and offbeat experiments (comprising boogie, samba, rockabilly and shameless prog). Plant had more power than the barely-there Jimmy Page, and with perhaps the fun, venturesome songs in the centre of Houses of the Holy as a launchpad, Out Door and Shaken form part of Plant’s larger on/off slipstream into buyoant art rock. The next such major example would be 1990’s similarly undersung Manic Nirvana, where he clevely sought out hip young thing Mark “Spike” Stent, latterly of sampler-noise pedigree with Age of Chance. While some of it is Plant responding to Permanent Vacation and Pump, just as often he’s in conference with more technodelic punks: “S S S & Q” is like an industrial parody of funk metal with atonal synths (with tonalities and mix teknique to make it a “Too Loud” relative), “Tie Dye on the Highway” is The Mission doing Madchester, while “Anniversary” is excavated synthpop, a brass band marching into the fog of No Man’s Land.

PAUL MCCARTNEY: Press to Play (1986)

Although McCartney only recently stopped having hits, I think it’s fair to say the last pair that Joe Public is likely to know, that wouldn’t require their memory to be jogged, are from late 1984: “No More Lonely Nights” and “We All Stand Together”. This isn’t a scenario unique to McCartney; “Undercover of the Night” (of which more in part two), “Overjoyed” and “Dancing in the Street” fit the same criteria. Although Live Aid (or at least the infrastructure it and the praxis of publications like the newly-launched Q help establish) helped repopularise some old faces (see 1986’s list of UK number one albums or US number one singles to get a feel for what I mean), another line it helped draw was that of the ‘Legacy’ artist. And more explicitly than anyone, this would apply to McCartney. He was a happening pop star in the first half of the 1980s, as he had always been, before he then struggled over the period that encompasses August 1986’s Press to Play. This wilderness resolved with 1989’s Flowers in the Dirt; that is, he was now in his Q heritage years, cosily making Stunning Returns to Form (which, as Marcello Carlin suggests, was when this phrase really started to gain critical currency, with McCartney’s new album counting such peers as Harvest, New York, Oh Mercy and, more tenuously, Tin Machine and Steel Wheels) and, after years away from the arena, cheerfully, thumbs-aloft indulging massive world tours which no doubt increasingly deprioritised songs from these new records.

So what releases were left mournfully in the wilderness period, caught in the crossfire? Why yes, poor old Press to Play. Essentially to McCartney what Dirty Work is to the Stones (the parallels are constantly provided in this framework, you see; Undercover as Pipes of Peace, Steel Wheels and its tour as Flowers and its tour), it came and went very quickly, bagging no major chart success or critical plaudits, and nothing from it has ever been performed live. Some might be forgiven for not remembering it ever happened.

But fortunately it did. Recognising that his complacency of late had steered him to a dead end with his Broad Street boondoggle, McCartney realised he needed a new box of tricks, new people to work with, to keep the commercial gravy train afloat. Not unusually, since this was the mid-1980s, his choice was Hugh Padgham, whose innovative engineering for XTC and the Police had led to some of the best-sounding rock music ever recorded. ‘Had’ being the operative word by this point, however, because by 1985 his hand in Bowie’s Tonight, Phil Collins’ No Jacket Required and similarly problematic projects saw a transformation into bigness for the sake of itself that has left many of these productions controversial. I’m certainly more charitable to him than many, so although others consider Press to Play to comprise “half-decent songs overdubbed, mixed and remixed to the point of stuffy, headachy inertia” (Carlin again), my misshapen antenna can’t help but be rather excited by its none-more-1986 florid electronic indulgences. Plus, Padgham dared to answer McCartney back, which he probably needed at this point, just as he would with Elvis Costello in 1989 and, most infamously, Nigel Godrich in 2005.

McCartney (and returning co-writer Eric Stewart on more than half the songs) flicker between experimental efforts and more traditional material. Those in the latter camp are usually third drawer Paul at best, an impression immediately filed by the opening “Stranglehold”, which would be ponderous enough for a country rocker, except Padgham force-feeds it anonymous horns (although the effect is hypnotically ‘off’ at times – swift squonks involved in a particular game of repulsion with the chorus). Several songs befit sporadic trajectories that will surface in and out of later albums; Paul’s “Latin” canon, for instance, gets an auspicious outlet with the delicate syncopation and nuevo flamenco of “Footprints”, while his increasing penchant for doubtful ‘rockers’ is on full display with the miscalculated, misnamed “Angry” (it’s actually more of a matey piss-up, Padgham having drafted in his old mucker Phil Collins to drum).

But it’s the cracks at apparently progressive music, or rather the fusions thereof with trad-McCartney, that command memories of the album, and they’re never less than noble. The panoramic contentedness underpinning “Good Times Coming/Feel the Sun” is vaguely redolent of London Town, except laced with LinnDrum for the 1986 sake of it, crossed with space age whirls that anticipate Air’s own soothing vistas. Although “Talk More Talk” is typical enough, there’s an inexplicably sullen ambient preface of formless New Age space-dust (resembling Black Sabbath’s “Stonehenge” and likewise foreshadowing Michael Woods’ doleful ambient-trance by over a decade) with overlapping (and meaningless) sampled speech straight out of the “Waking the Witch” guidebook. Even when the song proper is underway, a thwacking, bass-free middle-eight still hangs hazardously in mid-air, a feature typical of ‘this sort of thing’; see, for instance, the first verse of Def Leppard’s “Pour Some Sugar on Me”, wherein Test Dept wrecking ball beats are the be and and end all.

Or see the epilogue of “Press”, which is Tears for Fears’ “Mothers’ Talk” stripped to less than its bare essentials. This was the album’s only (modest) hit, and is an inspired mix of ur-McCartney with (literally) panting, blatantly Art of Noise-derived rhythms, but the real winner is when McCartney decides fuck it and goes for the Gabriel/Anderson golden ring on “Pretty Little Head”. The man who ten years earlier innocently smuggled industrial collage (the intro of “Silly Love Songs”) to the top of the American charts before Cabaret Voltaire had even made it out of Sheffield was once again making overt steps into these metallic workshops, as though instructing Padgham to belatedly give him the Peter Gabriel 4 makeover (a comparison aided by those penetrating WOMAD marimbas – as if running “The Rhythm of the Heat” through a “Lead a Normal Life” filter). It’s hardly Tackhead, which you surely don’t need me to tell you, but its metaphysical construction site noises – a foundation that masks the overall lack of discernible structure (let alone comprehensible lyrics) – show McCartney at his least compromising in years, an attribute that seems welcoming in the year of post-Live Aid politesse from Paul Simon to Steve Winwood. Once again, the Hounds of Love inspiration is not just a bit blatant.

He was gutted when it became his first ever non-charting ‘proper’ single, despite throwing novelty cassingles at the wall and everything. But if McCartney desired he could proudly claim much of Press as part of his on-off ‘experimental’ lineage, something he considers to run through “Tomorrow Never Knows”, McCartney I and II, The Fireman and other loose ends. McCartney II, similarly a critical punchbag in its day but now rightly venerated as a forward-thinking collection of homemade hybrid-pop (and that’s an understatement; it’s my favourite Paul album and the sessions produced many of my favourite songs he has ever recorded), is what many Press defenders are eager to draw parallels with, given the informal, synth-clad nature of both. Although misleading (not least since it ignores that their production aesthetics are polar opposites), the point still travels: Press to Play could do with a bit more attention. “To bring a happy ending to our song”.

LINDSEY BUCKINGHAM: Go Insane (1984)

With 1979’s Tusk, Lindsey Buckingham, the Richard Thompson of Fleetwood Mac, also became their Todd Rundgren. Well-loved now, the depths of the album’s many curveballs are such that it’s common for listeners to detect different pasts, presents and futures in its tracks. “The Ledge”, for instance, is mangled cowpunk, a song that sounds like it cost ten dollars to record on an album that cost a million. “Not That Funny” may have Devo’s convulsive synth-pop or even Pere Ubu in its headlights but the journey to get there leaves it decaying under a surface of keyboard twitches and uneven space. “What Makes You Think You’re the One”, essentially hollowed out Talking Heads with metallic punchbag percussion, has been dubbed lo-fi and yet the sibilance of the closing cymbal is so sharp it could have someone’s eye out. “That’s All for Everyone” makes a luscious mockery of Tame Impala. This is to say nothing of the free jazz drum workout that accelerates the strangeness of its hit title track, or the 11pm gnawing uncertainty of Christine McVie’s “Brown Eyes”, an open-ended puzzle of a pop song with no real way of getting to the centre (not so much due to how McVie is looking for promises in her love interest but how far the quietly perturbed music sells her state of mind, and how her ‘sha-la-la’s dissolve into the mist).

I’ve spent a whole paragraph on Tusk because it by all accounts should have contextualised the weirdness of Buckingham’s first two solo albums. His 1981 debut Law and Order updated the “Not That Funny” template into eleven jerky pop songs, the sort of speedy but inclusive new wave by a rock survivor that can count Bill Nelson, Landscape and even David Lindley’s El Rayo X as likeminded thinkers. Come 1984 and Go Insane, his love of precise drum engineering had been binned and in its place came fusty, distant drum machines. But such recent technology (including, most explicitly, our old friend the Fairlight CMI) and all the requisite innovations in programming inevitably did nothing to stunt his inner wizard. And yet critics put it in the hall for ostensibly foregoing songs for studio noodling. The overall idea is that such music is only supposed to be impressive on first listen, as if these sort of endeavours only have a short life. Well I do differ.

Putting the record on and getting confronted with “I Want You”, you’d be forgiven for thinking you were listening to a mid-00s avant-pop album for forty seconds; the unwavering alarm bell, Matmos anti-beats, Claude VonStroke digital whistles and Fischerspooner panache in the vocal all combine for a composite of times that do not yet exist. Once the song gets started proper, it’s very 1984 suddenly, but the extremely treated vocals and cavernous sound never let down. While the ensuing few songs are, perhaps, quintessential Buckingham, it’s only a matter of time before the ball rolls round again and thus comes the two-part “Play in the Rain”, and again you’re taken down some very strange paths. Its opening shrill string drone – the permeating threat that is never drawn attention to – is not unlike that found in the prog-trance of mid-to-late-90s Positiva (think Brainbug’s “Nightmare”), while said drone’s infrequent mutation into a bricolage rhythm of laser beams, splashing water, breaking glasses and other odd noises is comparable to an ambient remix of Michael Jackson’s Dangerous (while said rhythm’s dissolution into a fog of emanating synth-spirals – with the Positiva string still hanging dangerously above proceedings – practically invents the cold open to Big Audio Dynamite II’s Kool-Aid cut “In My Dreams”). Again, the ice-dancing ‘beats’ are barely louder than crickets, and you’re left curious as to which side the track is going to land on: pure atmospherica or proto-Timbaland? Neither is the solution, as it eventually decides to transmute into a sort of Arabic folk dance, of all things.

This starts to reveal itself as a strange relative of System 7’s berimbau-clad “7:7 Expansion” by the time it persists into the track’s “Continued” second part, which inaugurates side two and repeats much of the first part’s hall of mirrors but disentombs a very marooned AOR guitar for the hell of it. The fusion of stadium rock and arrythmica is like having premonitions of “In the Closet” and “Who Is It” all mixed up, barely able to make themselves visible at this early stage. From then on, the album is bendy art pop: “Loving Cup” goes for the shattering glass effect too, before a percussive acoustic guitar part tries its hardest not to turn into “Murrow Turning Over In His Grave” (understandably so, as that was almost two decades off existing). “Bang the Drum” is jittering Paulie psych-pop with swooning “Souvenir” voice clouds, while the closing “D.W. Suite” flickers between chaos and serenity in a fashion comparable to the Beta Band’s “Dr. Baker”. Comparable, that is, because of the lengths of those two extremes; you wouldn’t expect the Mellotron fairyland of its opening minutes to be interrupted by a swarm of discordant noise that easily could have fallen off the back of some Throbbing Gristle or This Heat master-tape, only to be nullified by ukulele flutters, but it happens. Let’s put it this way… the New Pop lecture he supposedly gave the rest of Fleetwood Mac when the sessions for 1987’s Tango in the Night commenced seems particularly easy to believe after even a solitary listen to Go Insane.

JEFF BECK: Flash (1985)

Since it is my current fascination, I don’t have all that many observations at this early stage to part about Flash, so I’ll keep it short and use it as a halfway house. But this naturally much-disliked Jeff Beck record was his own raiding of the dance-pop closet, hiring Nile Rodgers to solidify all his digital friskiness as was the fashion at the time and then also hiring Arthur Baker, a move which was similarly fashionable at the time, to repeat the task on two songs that Rodgers was absent from. Of course he didn’t stop there, because Beck isn’t much of a singer, so he appointed his buddy Jimmy Hall (or, on one dull ballad, Rod Stewart) to chummily wrangle most of the vocals. The result is a hodgepodge with no clear direction beyond the vague pointer that we must ‘get with the times’.

Why was everyone so eager to work with, and limit, Rodgers? So many of his pop production deals at the time underused him – not least Bowie, whose Let’s Dance undervalued everyone and everything involved; the Bowie/Rodgers partnership would not fire on all cylinders until Black Tie White Noise a decade later. But on “Ambitious”, in which Beck has seemingly instructed himself to play like Rodgers in the backcloth, the latter still seemingly remembers only two years had passed since Adventures in the Land of the Good Groove and usefully imbues a roominess into the music. He does similarly well elsewhere, as on the laughably faceless “Get Workin'”, while thunderbolts of Jan Hammer-programmed Fairlight come and go nicely on the almost obligatory ‘mood piece’ “Escape”. Baker comes off less successfully – the gothic rumble of “Gets Us All in the End” wishes it was “The Sun Always Shines on T.V.” (strange as it hadn’t been released yet), while “Ecstasy” is an exercise in limp swingbeat (which, again, did not yet exist) that begs to be fleshed out in some way or another.

Why spend all this time on an only half-successful album? Partly due to “Stop, Look and Listen”, which has some of the most baffling drum programming I’ve ever laid ears on in a rock context, as though Beck and Rodgers had heard “777-9311” and wished to repeat its magic. It skitters and scampers absurdly across the track, anticipating – in its own timid way – the ceaseless kinetic lingua franca of footwork and IDM. That Beck barely wrote much of a song to accompany it only deepens the effect, likewise the distorted orchestral hits that he cannot stop fiddling with. And honestly, the antiquated feel of the machines accelerate the eccentricity in today’s ears, likewise with “Night After Night” – which is the kind of music that would have soundtracked ITV Night Time had it existed a few years ahead of schedule.

The CD edition had two extra tracks, something almost everyone was eager to do at this point because the format was still a luxury, but Beck took advantage of the novelty. “Nighthawks” is corny Gladiators rock but again those drums shock the listener from the get-go with what resembles a malfunctioning LinnDrum wishing it was Phil Taylor. If that wasn’t enough, the other song, “Back on the Streets”, tries much the same thing, to the point where its opening twelve seconds and mid-song breakdown feel as though the drum machine was commanded to strive for free jazz. These songs and “Stop, Look and Listen” leave you scratching your head wondering what the thought processes were, and it’s precisely this unnavigable nature that justifies the entire enterprise. No such ambiguities are around to grip listeners of Clapton’s contemporary Behind the Sun, you won’t be surprised to hear.

Continued in part two.

About Popluck

Welcome to Popluck: Sidelong perspectives on pop history

Over five pieces, this blog aims to explore divergent narratives within pop. That is, to shed perhaps less common lights on prolific and notable parts of musical history and consider them anew. They are all written by me, Lee, a 24 year old music journalism student from Wiltshire.

With “Synth-surfing with rock (1983-1986)” (two parts), numerous maligned mid-1980s electronic rock albums by major artists are profiled. Rather than by and large site them within the canons of their makers, I seek more to take them at face value, or contextualise them within the larger musical world. I’m less interested in what the musicians may have thought they were doing, and more what I believe they ended up doing. To this end, I generally avoid direct quotations and seek to make generally self-contained studies on each album, aiming not to at least present open-ended cases for their less obvious qualities. Furthermore, being largely interested in the musical rather than thematic content of these records, my intention was to make this explicit.

For my reappraisals of McFly and Dave, Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich, I rather simply took two favourite bands, neither of which I believe to have been the subject of too much literature, and ran through their careers and aimed to connect releases in easily and neatly weaved threads, hopefully drawing interesting observations to cast the groups in intertextual contexts. The remaining piece, “To the Beat of the Drum: The Chart Heyday of Functional Dance Music”, highlights what I believe to be a loose continuum of minor, reticent dance chart hits – largely club crossovers – from the 1990s that I believe have been unsupported in the years since due to the way the canon has been painted (while also seeking to link such club hits with others that are better-known and more beatified). I try painting these modest hits as not merely inaccessible minor crossover hits but as a distinctly pensive canon in their own right.

The base aim of the blog is to prompt engagement with the pieces and to try and encourage readers to consider the subjects in a different fashion. Enjoy!